• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

ShockOfGod

arg-fallbackName="Lallapalalable"/>
omfg that guy is retarded. I watched some of his santa syndrome videos, and he pretty much jerks his ego off while talking about how 'we' bring up santa as a red herring because we are afraid (of what, I never did find out).
 
arg-fallbackName="Nautyskin"/>
Ce4or said:
And convenient timing a word from tooltime9901
Dealt with adequately. Although this tooltime guy obviously needs glasses. Those eyes aren't really giving him much.

Just an observation :)
 
arg-fallbackName="Eidolon"/>
JustBusiness17 said:


This is the most annoying 30 minutes of shock being a douche trying to set up an online debate. He spends a huge amount of time trying to get enough airtime to ask his ridiculous fallacy. I'm pretty sure this is the video where shock says that god is on his side and gives him the strength to "always get his way" - which was somehow proof of god to him.


Was the audio in that video looped? I kept hearing the same lines repeated several times. It sounded like the audio was looped over and overlapped to make it sound like a mess.
 
arg-fallbackName="JustBusiness17"/>
Eidolon said:
JustBusiness17 said:


This is the most annoying 30 minutes of shock being a douche trying to set up an online debate. He spends a huge amount of time trying to get enough airtime to ask his ridiculous fallacy. I'm pretty sure this is the video where shock says that god is on his side and gives him the strength to "always get his way" - which was somehow proof of god to him.


Was the audio in that video looped? I kept hearing the same lines repeated several times. It sounded like the audio was looped over and overlapped to make it sound like a mess.

More like Shock repeating himself over and over...
 
arg-fallbackName="MillionSword"/>
Who is that DEBATE FAITH guy? He's pretty cool. Made me laugh a few times too. "Shit or get of the pot" rofl.

Gawd, shock is a twit.
 
arg-fallbackName="pendulousphallus"/>
http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod?blend=1&ob=4#p/u/12/3T5ELd71RLc

Shock regarding LOR:

"Yeah, I'll go on your little TV show. Lord knows you could use the ratings."

Missed this weeks show :( , but 1000+ viewers every week. Wonder what his silly radio show pulls in. *facepalm*

Please, LORds of Virtue, subject him to a humiliating defeat when he calls in.

In thunderf00t's name we pr(a/e)y,
--Amen.
 
arg-fallbackName="ImprobableJoe"/>
I think the trick to dealing with this prick is to have quick access to a Mute button, so he can't talk over you incessantly. Then you set a topic, and mute him every time he goes off-topic.
 
arg-fallbackName="pendulousphallus"/>
ImprobableJoe said:
I think the trick to dealing with this prick is to have quick access to a Mute button, so he can't talk over you incessantly. Then you set a topic, and mute him every time he goes off-topic.

Yeah, but you can't talk to him unless it's on his silly radio show.
 
arg-fallbackName="JustBusiness17"/>
pendulousphallus said:
http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod?blend=1&ob=4#p/u/12/3T5ELd71RLc

Shock regarding LOR:

"Yeah, I'll go on your little TV show. Lord knows you could use the ratings."

Missed this weeks show :( , but 1000+ viewers every week. Wonder what his silly radio show pulls in. *facepalm*

Please, LORds of Virtue, subject him to a humiliating defeat when he calls in.

In thunderf00t's name we pr(a/e)y,
--Amen.
Beyond the nonsensical nature of Shock's question, who is MrSatanMan616 anyways? I've never seen him around here...

http://www.youtube.com/user/MrSatanMan616
 
arg-fallbackName="JustBusiness17"/>
Oh yeah, I completely forgot. When shock called into the debate in the video I posted, they asked Shock numerous times to define atheism so that they could answer his question intelligently. Every time they asked him, all he would say is "Madness".

Overall, Shock's approach to the topic is completely antagonistic with absolutely no interest in having a meaningful discussion...
 
arg-fallbackName="nasher168"/>
He talks as if the LoR is a single body...
I'm tempted to respond, I must admit. Obviously I would make it unignorably (if that's a word) clear at every opportunity that I don't answer on behalf of anyone on the League of Reason but myself. I would answer straight up that there is no proof or evidence that atheism is correct, but most atheists simply don't believe in God for lack of evidence.
 
arg-fallbackName="pendulousphallus"/>
I'm tempted to call into his radio show and take adopt the arguments of "hard" atheists who say outright God is impossible.

I should maybe ignore him and get on with my life. I dunno.
 
arg-fallbackName="ImprobableJoe"/>
pendulousphallus said:
I'm tempted to call into his radio show and take adopt the arguments of "hard" atheists who say outright God is impossible.

I should maybe ignore him and get on with my life. I dunno.
That's ALWAYS a good idea. :D

Really, these sorts of things should only be engaged in to the level that they entertain you or add some sort of enrichment to your life. If it becomes a distraction from other things in your life, or just makes you pissed off and obsessed, you should just let it go. In the grand scheme of things, some douche-nozzle on the Internet probably doesn't warrant your attention unless you're having fun by giving him the attention.
 
arg-fallbackName="Nautyskin"/>
JustBusiness17 said:
Overall, Shock's approach to the topic is completely antagonistic with absolutely no interest in having a meaningful discussion...

Yeah, and he'd be the same if he were an atheist.

At the moment, this is exactly how I picture the guy:

 
arg-fallbackName="pendulousphallus"/>
ImprobableJoe said:
pendulousphallus said:
I'm tempted to call into his radio show and take adopt the arguments of "hard" atheists who say outright God is impossible.

I should maybe ignore him and get on with my life. I dunno.
That's ALWAYS a good idea. :D

Really, these sorts of things should only be engaged in to the level that they entertain you or add some sort of enrichment to your life. If it becomes a distraction from other things in your life, or just makes you pissed off and obsessed, you should just let it go. In the grand scheme of things, some douche-nozzle on the Internet probably doesn't warrant your attention unless you're having fun by giving him the attention.

I'm not losing sleep over it, but I do see myself getting frustrated with his behaviour, which probably isn't right. Alrighty then, I'm moving on.

Thanks for framing it that way, big Joe.
 
arg-fallbackName="JustBusiness17"/>
I'm feeling a little 4Chan-ish right now...
ImprobableJoe said:
pendulousphallus said:
I'm tempted to call into his radio show and take adopt the arguments of "hard" atheists who say outright God is impossible.

I should maybe ignore him and get on with my life. I dunno.
That's ALWAYS a good idea. :D

Really, these sorts of things should only be engaged in to the level that they entertain you or add some sort of enrichment to your life. If it becomes a distraction from other things in your life, or just makes you pissed off and obsessed, you should just let it go. In the grand scheme of things, some douche-nozzle on the Internet probably doesn't warrant your attention unless you're having fun by giving him the attention.
Maybe we should run a poe-train on his ass? Satire the fuck out of the guy. Hit him with a barrage of undeniably-poe call-ins that aim to get a point across. Shock's being a complete ass with his ridiculous question so maybe some ridiculous responses are in order :arrow:
Nautyskin said:
JustBusiness17 said:
Overall, Shock's approach to the topic is completely antagonistic with absolutely no interest in having a meaningful discussion...

Yeah, and he'd be the same if he were an atheist.

At the moment, this is exactly how I picture the guy:


I love this response so much, I turned it into a video editing challenge: http://forums.leagueofreason.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=5124


=========================

IMO, ShockofGod is an ignorant and annoying "fundie-fucktard" who deserves everything the internet can throw at him :geek:
 
arg-fallbackName="pendulousphallus"/>
JustBusiness17 said:
I'm feeling a little 4Chan-ish right now...

=========================

IMO, ShockofGod is an ignorant and annoying "fundie-fucktard" who deserves everything the internet can throw at him :geek:

Hm... Maybe I'm not done with his. We'll see. PM me and lemme know how I can contribute for lulz.
 
arg-fallbackName="AsheIsTheRaven"/>
pendulousphallus said:
Shock should totes call in AE if he's throwing down these challenges. Somebody message him and tell him so, I 'm blocked. :(

Kinda difficult as he's blocked next to everyone with an opposing view, so guess what, I blocked him too. Got no time to waste with idiots who spam my channel with a challenge they don't want an answer to
 
Back
Top