Second-Hand Smoking and Public Health - Politics or Science?

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Re: Second-Hand Smoking and Public Health - Politics or Scie

Except that new papers were released which did present credible evidence for the dangers of second hand smoke some of which have been posted in this thread. So you can either read those or keep you head up your ass.

Is English your first language?

Please, tell me how:

I said that I was looking through the papers cited in that study that was brought up to them - of which I am still running numbers on my own and am reading in parts now that I've found the release.

Is somehow:

HURKA DURR TL;DR BRO

Unlike some chucklefucks who, apparently, quickly dash through a paragraph or so on a forum and can't comprehend the actual response given within it, I appreciate the time into reviewing scientific articles and actually responding to what people are actually saying and claims being brought forth.

 

[Duvelthehobbit666]

Re: Second-Hand Smoking and Public Health - Politics or Scie

I said that I was looking through the papers cited in that study that was brought up to them - of which I am still running numbers on my own and am reading in parts now that I've found the release.

Which study is this? You mention a study but it is not clear to me if this is the study is the study mentioned in the Penn and Teller or a different study. Be clear and don't hurr durr me when you forget to mention what you are reading.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Re: Second-Hand Smoking and Public Health - Politics or Scie

I believe Inferno linked me to them.