aeritano
New Member
I have always hear from YT creatards, that scientists never admit when they are wrong and are very unethical when publishing work.
well.. here was an example of how ethical scientists can be, and willing to admit that their data is flawed.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/21/us-science-retraction-idUSTRE76K5IN20110721
this was one of the greatest papers on the identification of aging genes. A great paper that was a victim of defective equipment. The authors willing retracted the paper when they repeated the experiments with non defective equipment and didnt get the same results.
Scientists are always willing to retract data and papers if there is an issue. Science its not about finding truth, its about factual understanding... and letting something that is factually incorrect get published is not acceptable in the scientific world
well.. here was an example of how ethical scientists can be, and willing to admit that their data is flawed.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/21/us-science-retraction-idUSTRE76K5IN20110721
this was one of the greatest papers on the identification of aging genes. A great paper that was a victim of defective equipment. The authors willing retracted the paper when they repeated the experiments with non defective equipment and didnt get the same results.
Scientists are always willing to retract data and papers if there is an issue. Science its not about finding truth, its about factual understanding... and letting something that is factually incorrect get published is not acceptable in the scientific world