Ridiculous U.S. gun laws.

[Patty P]

No Patty, stop being evasive. You're complaining that no one is addressing QAnonClown's posts - I told you that it's because of the bullshit he's been posting. Examples of that include blaming brown people for violence in the USA, and continually referring to foreign brown people as 'Third World People'.

Are you saying I am not entitled to consider such behavior clownery and respond as I see fit to it?

You are invited to use those quotes as evidence that he is q anon (which to be clear 13/50 memes is not qanon is actually more associated with the alt right AND the opinion alone cannot identify someone as Q anon). But thats not what you did. You asked me a personal question and then attempted to do what I asked you to do dozens of messages earlier, which was provide some evidence.

You literally could have just said, "he has made 13/50 claims about minorities and I think that is a trait of a q anon-er". Like that would have shortened this thread considerably.

Btw heres a link on what q anon is and what they believe:

QAnon - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

Sorry, not even willing to discuss it until the discussion can be had.

You and Spar are the ones preventing the conversation you came here hostile.

First posts in either thread



First posts in either thread

 

[Sparhafoc]

You are invited to use those quotes as evidence that he is q anon

Why would I use those quotes as evidence that he is a member of QAnon when they're not even remotely connected nor did I suggest any connection at all?

(which to be clear 13/50 memes is not qanon is actually more associated with the alt right AND the opinion alone cannot identify someone as Q anon).

What 'opinion'?

But thats not what you did. You asked me a personal question and then attempted to do what I asked you to do dozens of messages earlier, which was provide some evidence.

I'm not sure if you think that I am unable to spot you being evasive.

You literally could have just said, "he has made 13/50 claims about minorities and I think that is a trait of a q anon-er". Like that would have shortened this thread considerably.

I am not in the slightest bit trying to connect his racist bigoted statements to anything to do with QAnon - you've made that associaton absent any justification in anything I wrote. While many QAnoners are white supremacists, not all of them are. Many are not even bad people, just horribly misguided.

Btw heres a link on what q anon is and what they believe:

QAnon - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I am quite well aware of what they believe, but thank you.

But anyway, back to the actual point.

Do you think it's unreasonable for people encountering such racist bullshit to consider the person making such statements a total fucking clown, or not?

Because you seem to have come in to this conversation with a bunch of assumptions.

The reason why QanonClown is receiving the contempt of the membership here is BECAUSE of these pathetic edgelord statements he asserts as fact.

Are you going to engage with this now, or attempt to slip away from it again?

 

[Sparhafoc]

You and Spar are the ones preventing the conversation you came here hostile.

First posts in either thread
View attachment 400
View attachment 401

First posts in either thread
View attachment 402
View attachment 403

Absolutely, these instances happened after you'd already written 100+ posts of absolute dreck, bigoted bullshit, and racist fucknuttery. And factually, it was you who 'came here' as we were already here before. As I said: we all know why you came here.

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

Absolutely, these instances happened after you'd already written 100+ posts of absolute dreck, bigoted bullshit, and racist fucknuttery. And factually, it was you who 'came here' as we were already here before. As I said: we all know why you came here.

No. They those screen caps are directly after citing LAW. Prove me wrong. You came to my thread. Send a screen cap.

 

[Patty P]

I am not in the slightest bit trying to connect his racist bigoted statements to anything to do with QAnon

 

[Sparhafoc]

Why do you keep referring to me as 'nigga'?

How exactly is it different from me continually calling you 'bitch' or some other derogatory epithet?

Oh and by the way - you evasion is terribly transparent. Weren't you only just pretending to be all interested in serious discussion!

Regardless, you now know why QAnon guy is receiving disdain from the people here. You are entitled to form any opinion you like regarding that, just like you're entitled to be as evasive as you like, and to make assumptions absent relevant knowledge.

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

Why do you keep referring to me as 'nigga'?

How exactly is it different from me continually calling you 'bitch' or some other derogatory epithet?

Oh and by the way - you evasion is terribly transparent. Weren't you only just pretending to be all interested in serious discussion!

Regardless, you now know why QAnon guy is receiving disdain from the people here. You are entitled to form any opinion you like regarding that, just like you're entitled to be as evasive as you like, and to make assumptions absent relevant knowledge.

Why don't you actually engage with the topic of the thread?

 

[Sparhafoc]

No. They those screen caps are directly after citing LAW. Prove me wrong. You came to my thread. Send a screen cap.

We already did this clown.

I then pointed you to the fact that executive orders resulted in the internment of over 100,000 people... and you responded with some internally contradictory garbled nonsense then started talking about drinking tears and engaging in homoerotic fantasies about me.

 

[Sparhafoc]

Why don't you actually engage with the topic of the thread?

I already have, as I've told you now 3 times.

 

[Patty P]

Why do you keep referring to me as 'nigga'?

How exactly is it different from me continually calling you 'bitch' or some other derogatory epithet?

Oh and by the way - you evasion is terribly transparent. Weren't you only just pretending to be all interested in serious discussion!

Regardless, you now know why QAnon guy is receiving disdain from the people here. You are entitled to form any opinion you like regarding that, just like you're entitled to be as evasive as you like, and to make assumptions absent relevant knowledge.

Imagine complaining about being called "nigga" when it's natural AAVE.

 

[Patty P]

Oh and by the way - you evasion is terribly transparent. Weren't you only just pretending to be all interested in serious discussion!

This also did not happen. I didn't feign interest.

Literally nobody but YOU is being invasive. That's the irony in all this.

 

[Sparhafoc]

Imagine complaining about being called "nigga" when it's natural AAVE.

So the word bitch is natural language, therefore I can just post 'bitch' memes instead of replying to anything in the post?

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

We already did this clown.

I then pointed you to the fact that executive orders resulted in the internment of over 100,000 people... and you responded with some internally contradictory garbled nonsense then started talking about drinking tears and engaging in homoerotic fantasies about me.

Those statements were made AFTER your first post. Take a look at the actual thread. You didn't cite anything. Literally after I posted the screen cap of LAW.

 

[Sparhafoc]

This also did not happen. I didn't feign interest.

You were very interested that proper debate standards were met before, now you're suddenly disinterested.

You seem to be disinterested in a lot of things that are relevant to this thread and discussion.

Literally nobody but YOU is being invasive. That's the irony in all this.

Except, of course, that's bullshit.

I've not made a single statement that could, in any way, shape or form, be considered 'invasive'.

You asked Hackenslash which country he's from, I guess that might possibly constitute 'invasiveness' but I doubt anyone would seriously consider it so.


Oh and by the way, I'm still not distracted by your evasions.

Are people justified in responding negatively to ignorant racism or not, Pattie P?

 

[Sparhafoc]

Those statements were made AFTER your first post. Take a look at the actual thread. You didn't cite anything. Literally after I posted the screen cap of LAW.

I didn't say I cited anything, did I clown?

Instead, I referred to Executive Order 9066, which I assumed you would be capable of copy and pasting into a search engine without me needing to take pictures for you.

 

[BoganUSAFFLClerk]

I didn't say I cited anything, did I clown?

Instead, I referred to Executive Order 9066, which I assumed you would be capable of copy and pasting into a search engine without me needing to take pictures for you.

I said to cite a screencap where I instigated the now 15 pages or so of nonsense from you. You didn't do that. I cited with screencaps about you and hackenslash starting off hostile with insults.

You claim I levied insults first after being racist. This didn't happen. Your first posts were insults after citation of law.

Here is yet another example:

Stop being dishonest and simply engage with the topic.

 

[Patty P]

You were very interested that proper debate standards were met before, now you're suddenly disinterested.

You seem to be disinterested in a lot of things that are relevant to this thread and discussion.




Except, of course, that's bullshit.

I've not made a single statement that could, in any way, shape or form, be considered 'invasive'.

You asked Hackenslash which country he's from, I guess that might possibly constitute 'invasiveness' but I doubt anyone would seriously consider it so.


Oh and by the way, I'm still not distracted by your evasions.

Are people justified in responding negatively to ignorant racism or not, Pattie P?

I dont expect you to read minds, but I committed a typo. I meant evasive.

I think its clear that you on multiple occasions attempted to evade some responsibility involving your accusations and claims. Thats on you. It has been less than fruitful having a banter with you. I hope that you one day cease your infantile contrarian dishonesty and grow up even at the tender age of upper 60's.

 

[Sparhafoc]

You didn't do that.

I don't perform tricks on command. Get a dog.

 

[Sparhafoc]

I dont expect you to read minds, but I committed a typo. I meant evasive.

I think its clear that you on multiple occasions attempted to evade some responsibility involving your accusations and claims. Thats on you. It has been less than fruitful having a banter with you. I hope that you one day cease your infantile contrarian dishonesty and grow up even at the tender age of upper 60's.

You've come across as a spoiled little brat, Patty - I think that's a real shame, and I hope you reflect on it and come back better.

And yes, you are still evading answering my direct question. And yes, I noticed it.