bluejatheist
New Member
I'd like to post a pet idea of mine in the spirit of having some discourse. This is geared more to a United States setting given the nature of U.S. prisons. Not trolling, I consider this a viable idea at the time of this posting but I'm not set in my ways, hence it being placed here for scrutiny.
A brief outline:
AMEND: The entertainment aspect of this idea is rather superfluous so I amend my idea to simply allowing prisoners to fight under controlled conditions as an alternative to their usual methods. Whether this is public spectacle or behind government-funded closed-doors is less important to my point as it is now.
I propose(hypothetically since it obviously wouldn't happen)that a revival of mainstream bloodsport in the form of armed combat between consenting incarcerated individuals which allows the use of melee weapons and lethal force(but does not require combat or weapon training to already dangerous individuals) and designates a winner based upon the opponent being dead, surrendering or otherwise unable to continue. Rewards could include money, items for cells, or other desired payments(within reason of participants. Waivers would be signed and laws would be amended to allow otherwise felonious actions to be perpetrated under the circumstances of the sport. The sport would be held under secure conditions to prevent escape attempts or violence against non-participants.
Reasons:
1: Provides a source of spectator entertainment either for the general world or nation public, or the prison population itself.(I presume. I know I'd pay-per-view without hesitation. It was definitely popular for the Romans, but it has been a while since then.) Thus a viable source of income for any corrections system that organizes such events. Violent entertainment is popular, at least here(U.S.) and taking several steps further into this territory may be wildly profitable, or at least provide a manageable income. Even if this isn't the case the other reasons may compensate.
2: Provides an outlet of violence and aggression to violent inmates which otherwise have a life sentence to look forward to and otherwise are involved in violence within the (United States)prison system already.
3: Provides a means of reducing prison populations via the high likelihood of participant deaths. Reduces tax burden of permanently segregated convicts and reduces overcrowding burdens. (Presuming that participation would be high, which I think would be possible given the nature of prison populations, especially if teams are allowed to be formed along racial or gang affiliation lines. Also presuming income from spectators can cover medical costs of non-lethal injuries, although this may be remedied by a denial of emergency medical assistance or a requirement of finishing blows in games)
4: Dropping the above reasons and prison setting, I'd still favor making voluntary bloodsport legal with regulation.
Edited on and off, refresh to be sure.
A brief outline:
AMEND: The entertainment aspect of this idea is rather superfluous so I amend my idea to simply allowing prisoners to fight under controlled conditions as an alternative to their usual methods. Whether this is public spectacle or behind government-funded closed-doors is less important to my point as it is now.
I propose(hypothetically since it obviously wouldn't happen)that a revival of mainstream bloodsport in the form of armed combat between consenting incarcerated individuals which allows the use of melee weapons and lethal force(but does not require combat or weapon training to already dangerous individuals) and designates a winner based upon the opponent being dead, surrendering or otherwise unable to continue. Rewards could include money, items for cells, or other desired payments(within reason of participants. Waivers would be signed and laws would be amended to allow otherwise felonious actions to be perpetrated under the circumstances of the sport. The sport would be held under secure conditions to prevent escape attempts or violence against non-participants.
Reasons:
2: Provides an outlet of violence and aggression to violent inmates which otherwise have a life sentence to look forward to and otherwise are involved in violence within the (United States)prison system already.
3: Provides a means of reducing prison populations via the high likelihood of participant deaths. Reduces tax burden of permanently segregated convicts and reduces overcrowding burdens. (Presuming that participation would be high, which I think would be possible given the nature of prison populations, especially if teams are allowed to be formed along racial or gang affiliation lines. Also presuming income from spectators can cover medical costs of non-lethal injuries, although this may be remedied by a denial of emergency medical assistance or a requirement of finishing blows in games)
4: Dropping the above reasons and prison setting, I'd still favor making voluntary bloodsport legal with regulation.
Edited on and off, refresh to be sure.