Kevin R Brown
New Member
...Or, as it's more commonly branded, Ritalin.
Is this a good thing to be prescribing to children - or, perhaps more to the point, so many children, in the United States in particular? As I understand it, the drug is similar to Methamphetamine (though less potent), triggering a cascade release of dopamine in the brain. We know from autopsies of long term Methamphetamine (crystal meth) users that these dopamine releases eventually become neurotoxic, burning out the brain's reward receptors and inflicting permanent brain damage. Now, I've only done armchair research myself and I instinctively distrust any semi-populist rejection of medication, but I'm furrowing my eyebrows at this one a little bit. It appears that (and correct me if I'm wrong) double blind testing with a placebo control group has not been done to establish the effects of Methylphenidate on anyone (much less children) beyond a 4 week period. If that's true, I find it very disappointing that such a substance is so readily prescribed; Benzoylmethylecgonine (cocaine) also has many profound medical benefits when used in the short term - it's after the first few months of heavy use that the first signs of damage really start to appear.
I'd don't have a horse in this race, so to speak, and am not part of any type of ridiculous crusade to STOP TEH BIG PHARMA!!!!, so be nice if my armchair research (I stuck largely to academic literature, though obviously I could only read so many papers and, well, I'm not sure I understood half of them) has led me astray - what's the overall consensus on the use of Ritalin (particularly pertaining to children) in order to control ADHD? (....Or, at least, the overall consensus aside from that of the American Psychological Association, which is quite positive. I'll be up front about a personal bias of mine: I don't trust the APA, at all, and I do not consider them to have proven themselves to be a dedicated scientific body. They pay lip service to parapsychology, they to this day refuse to fully accept that lobotomies were an inappropriate way to treat mental illnesses, they to this day insist on the medical effectiveness of electroshock therapy (which, by it's very nature, cannot be subjected to double blind clinical analysis), until only very recently considered homosexuality to be a form of mental disorder, support extremely dubious experiments & findings (Zimbardo's infamous Stanford Prison 'Experiment' is the first that springs to mind), etc. Now, that doesn't mean I think that their opinion on the issue of Ritalin is wrong here - I don't have enough information about Ritalin and it's use in treating ADHD in order to form my own opinion - it simply means that I don't consider any consensus they present as any more credible than that of Hollywood celebrities).
Is this a good thing to be prescribing to children - or, perhaps more to the point, so many children, in the United States in particular? As I understand it, the drug is similar to Methamphetamine (though less potent), triggering a cascade release of dopamine in the brain. We know from autopsies of long term Methamphetamine (crystal meth) users that these dopamine releases eventually become neurotoxic, burning out the brain's reward receptors and inflicting permanent brain damage. Now, I've only done armchair research myself and I instinctively distrust any semi-populist rejection of medication, but I'm furrowing my eyebrows at this one a little bit. It appears that (and correct me if I'm wrong) double blind testing with a placebo control group has not been done to establish the effects of Methylphenidate on anyone (much less children) beyond a 4 week period. If that's true, I find it very disappointing that such a substance is so readily prescribed; Benzoylmethylecgonine (cocaine) also has many profound medical benefits when used in the short term - it's after the first few months of heavy use that the first signs of damage really start to appear.
I'd don't have a horse in this race, so to speak, and am not part of any type of ridiculous crusade to STOP TEH BIG PHARMA!!!!, so be nice if my armchair research (I stuck largely to academic literature, though obviously I could only read so many papers and, well, I'm not sure I understood half of them) has led me astray - what's the overall consensus on the use of Ritalin (particularly pertaining to children) in order to control ADHD? (....Or, at least, the overall consensus aside from that of the American Psychological Association, which is quite positive. I'll be up front about a personal bias of mine: I don't trust the APA, at all, and I do not consider them to have proven themselves to be a dedicated scientific body. They pay lip service to parapsychology, they to this day refuse to fully accept that lobotomies were an inappropriate way to treat mental illnesses, they to this day insist on the medical effectiveness of electroshock therapy (which, by it's very nature, cannot be subjected to double blind clinical analysis), until only very recently considered homosexuality to be a form of mental disorder, support extremely dubious experiments & findings (Zimbardo's infamous Stanford Prison 'Experiment' is the first that springs to mind), etc. Now, that doesn't mean I think that their opinion on the issue of Ritalin is wrong here - I don't have enough information about Ritalin and it's use in treating ADHD in order to form my own opinion - it simply means that I don't consider any consensus they present as any more credible than that of Hollywood celebrities).