Noumenon
New Member
According to the BBC News website, the Pope is about to become quotable to the effect that condoms can be permitted under certain circumstances - strange choice of circumstance though.
I'm new here and I can't figure out how to embed url's into text, so here's the link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11804398
So, in the closed context of men (but not women for some reason) having sex for money, condoms are okay, provided you have AIDS. I guess if you're going to hell anyway...He said condoms could reduce the risk of HIV infection, such as for a male prostitute [my emphasis...], in a series of interviews given to a German journalist.
I would like (from a strictly theoretical point of view, mind) to see the condom that could filter for disease without getting in the way of the sperm, that would be a really good trick. I guess the Pope would too, because then all those disease-ridden male prostitutes who want to spare their clients the possibility of a terminal infection and help them bring a joyous new life into the world would finally be able to do so.The Pope gives the example of the use of condoms by male prostitutes as "a first step towards moralisation", even though condoms are "not really the way to deal with the evil of HIV infection".
He says that the "sheer fixation on the condom implies a banalisation of sexuality" where sexuality is no longer an expression of love, "but only a sort of drug that people administer to themselves".
"If the intention is to prevent transmission of the virus, rather than prevent contraception, moral theologians would say that was of a different moral order."
I'm new here and I can't figure out how to embed url's into text, so here's the link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11804398