• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

obsessed with women's snatch

arg-fallbackName="televator"/>
You see my problem now? That's the state I live in. You and I could not be made neighbors soon enough.
 
arg-fallbackName="Nom_de_Plume"/>
televator said:
You see my problem now? That's the state I live in. You and I could not be made neighbors soon enough.
Click to expand...
If you come for a visit soon, you could help me put my crop in... I'll even let you drive my kubota, it's orange, you'll like it :lol:
 
arg-fallbackName="Jebez42"/>
Nom_de_Plume said:
If you come for a visit soon, you could help me put my crop in... I'll even let you drive my kubota, it's orange, you'll like it :lol:
Click to expand...

If it is not Greene, I'm not driving it. :D
 
arg-fallbackName="Nom_de_Plume"/>
Jebez42 said:
If it is not Greene, I'm not driving it. :D
Click to expand...
Green as - runs on biodiesel? Or green as in a John Deere? or Green as in Catholic?
Oh dear we've/I've completely derailed the thread.
Back on topic we go.
We were talking about snatch and a woman's right to decide what happens to it and with it.
I also don't agree with the article when they mention that you can't sue your doctor for malpractice because he has his head shoved up his ass and doesn't tell you everything you need to know deliberately lying by omission that could affect your health and well being .
How the heck is that even logical?
I'm dashed!
 
arg-fallbackName="Isotelus"/>
arg-fallbackName="Nom_de_Plume"/>
Ya I signed it too.
But.........
I just got an email from one of my CFI members and he said "DON'T PANIC! WE'RE ON IT".

http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/action/M-312.html
Motion M-312 is motivated solely by anti-abortion ideology. The intent is to bestow legal personhood on fetuses in order to re-criminalize abortion. M-312 is a waste of time and taxpayer money because the issues it raises have already been answered by Canada's Supreme Court. Further, there are zero problems with the existing law or current medical practice that need addressing. Fetal personhood would also seriously undermine the constitutional rights of pregnant women under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, not just for those who need abortions, but for any pregnant woman. It would invite the prosecution of pregnant women for any perceived harm to fetuses by creating confusion around how child welfare laws and policies apply to fetuses as legal persons. Further, the motion itself is unworkable because it rests on misinterpretations of the Criminal Code, misleading use of language, and logical fallacies.
Click to expand...

Thankyou Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.....
Don't US people have that?
*edit to fix
I mean don't they have "something " like that, they obviously don't have exactly "Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms"
I'll try and read over my posts better before hitting send
 
arg-fallbackName="CommonEnlightenment"/>
It appears that some people are more concerned with their IPhones than something along the lines of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

*Edit to add:

Well, if you are talking about the Bill of Rights, then yes, the United States does have that sort of document. It appears that some individuals think that a certain book supercedes the Bill of Rights. And some individuals will go so far as to cause great harm through cyberbullying. A significant problem for this particular generation IMHO.
 
arg-fallbackName="Nom_de_Plume"/>
Well my little group of CFI females started an "oppose motion 312" facebook page... in doing some background research I found some appalling news stories from the USA in states where personhood bills were enacted whereby women (who were actually carrying their child to term and wanted their baby) were arrested or usurped when trying to choose how to go about their pregnancies and delivery.
This is actually why we're so opposed to opening this debate on when "personhood" begins. Precedence to date indicates that things go very badly for women when a governing body decides a foetus is a person before it becomes a separate entity (pumping it's own blood/getting oxygen on it's own)
So far it seems that even though the woman owned her body first, the state feels that the foetus now has more rights to it than she does.
 
arg-fallbackName="Nom_de_Plume"/>
I never knew watching Canadian parliamentary debates could be so stimulating. I watched the live feed yesterday on motion 312 (foetal personhood) here in Canada and my faith in humanity has been restored.
The MP, putting forward this bag of claptrap motion got his ass handed to him
Emoticon-woohoo.gif

One female MP, from my own province totally pwnd him, she was bloody brilliant. (she's not my mp but how I wish she was, mine was sitting beside the misogynistic biblethumping prick who put the motion forward)

here's a link http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/04/26/the-commons-a-debate-about-a-debate-about-abortion/
 
arg-fallbackName="Nom_de_Plume"/>
jealous of canada

http://jezebel.com/5905650/dastardl...mpts-to-bring-the-personhood-debate-to-canada
There are certainly those who oppose abortion in the country (canada), but there are no laws restricting abortion and haven't been since 1988, which sounds like a dream scenario to many Americans.
Click to expand...
Actually I loved some of the comments at the end of this blog.
A user named Ignotus:
Okay, seriously, is there anything bad in Canada? Because it's starting to look like Disneyland from where I'm at. Got any room for a disgruntled but not bitter American up there?
Click to expand...

Even though I'm only an immigrant I've discovered I have a very strong patriotism to my country :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top