• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

NWO )New World Order)

arg-fallbackName="XC(A)libur"/>
Economical or the conspiracy theory? I find the theory very entertaining. I find the economical reprecussions of the new world order devistating.
 
arg-fallbackName="Weirdtopia"/>
Well both i guess, I'm leaning toward the Conspiracy Theory since it's in the Conspiracy Theory but if you want to talk about the economics part of the idea then go for it.
 
arg-fallbackName="ImprobableJoe"/>
Weirdtopia said:
Well both i guess, I'm leaning toward the Conspiracy Theory since it's in the Conspiracy Theory but if you want to talk about the economics part of the idea then go for it.
What do you think?
 
arg-fallbackName="Finger"/>
The conspiracy theorists act like a world government is automatically a bad thing. But what we should be asking is, "what kind of government?"
 
arg-fallbackName="Synystyr"/>
Its already looking like brave new world with some of the crap that is going on, adding an expansion pack to include the rest of the world doesn't do anything to fix the bug.
 
arg-fallbackName="Finger"/>
Synystyr said:
Its already looking like brave new world with some of the crap that is going on, adding an expansion pack to include the rest of the world doesn't do anything to fix the bug.
That's what patches and user-based support communities are for.
 
arg-fallbackName="Finger"/>
Yes.. Software of the people, by the people, and for the people. Like I said, the type of government is important.

Dismissing the idea of world government for no other reason than, "it is government" would be the same as dismissing the idea of any government for no other reason than, "it is government."
 
arg-fallbackName="Weirdtopia"/>
Well many people can argue that it's both an economic and an political conspiracy
 
arg-fallbackName="irmerk"/>
I flew to California this past winter break and sat next to a girl which very vehemently believed in the NWO and FEMA camps. I had not yet heard of any such thing and was surprised to hear her say the government is building FEMA camps to get rid of a large portion of the population. I asked why... Well, no answer. Lawl.

As for a global governance:
Finger said:
...what we should be asking is, "what kind of government?"
Any government, new governance, or addition to current governance is decided upon by those in power. They do not need to justify it to anyone but themselves; those in power will never investigate themselves. Any attempt I could foresee or envision actually happening to create a world government would be no better or worse than that of any country today; unjustified, corrupt and self perpetuating. The last part describes such things as the democratic or republican party members choosing to allow or not to allow someone new into the party to run for public office. This weeds out anyone not with the same political ideologies. If a better republic method or just better government was developed, then a world government would actually be a good thing. Well, any government like what I just described would be a good thing...
 
arg-fallbackName="Mapp"/>
Well depending on the conspiracy theorist you talk to there are so many NWO's to choose from. You've got the Freemasons, the Illuminati, the Capitalists for the left, the Communists for the right, and of course the standard fall-back: THE JEEEEEEEEEEEEEWS.

My favorite NWO will of course always be when Hulk Hogan went bad
hogan_nitro.jpg


And look!

f2217062e9a397aL.jpg


Compelling evidence indeed.
 
arg-fallbackName="felixthecoach"/>
I contest the existence of this thread.

What is the point of this thread? It's like opening a thread titled, "Cheese Crackers" and then saying,

"Discuss"

What are we supposed to think? the term is way too broad.
 
arg-fallbackName="GegoXAREN"/>
blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarg honk blarg?
blarg honk honk blarg hoonk baarg......
honk honk hoooooonk blarg!


AAAAA AA AAAAAAA A AAAAAA A?
AA AAAAAAAAAAA AAAA AAAAAA......
AAAAAAAAAAAA AA AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AA!
 
arg-fallbackName="Ozymandyus"/>
Anarchy... you keep using that word. I'm not sure it means what you think it means.

I honestly wonder though what anarchists exactly expect from an anarchist world government... the unorganized forms seem indistinguishable from war (i.e. somalia), and the organized forms are basically tyranny of the majority (i.e. reign of terror). What is it that you expect anarchy as a system to look like?
 
arg-fallbackName="Mapp"/>
Um, I thought New World Order was supposed to mean a vast encompassing conspiracy to control the globe. Anarchists by definition it would seem would be incapable of that kind of thing.
 
Back
Top