Nephilimfree Challenges Thunderf00t

[Daealis]

Another Challenger Appears.... and he is super-ineffective! (Or is it all a clever trap?)

"This Video contains content from Sony Music Entertainment, who has blockedit in your country on copyright grounds"

 

[Inferno]

I'd say Thunderf00t should nominate someone to conduct the debate for him. I agree with Rex that Thunder is not the best debater there is.

 

[LordCustos3]

Never Mind all that.
A new twist has happened in the Nephie vs. TruePooka front.

When the Happy Cabbie found out that NephilimFraidyCat scheduled a BlogTalkRadio session for Saturday November 13, 2010 at 2pm Central Time, he realized that it would be a perfect opportunity to FORCE a debate.

​

And right after Nephie found out, he freaked out. In the comment section he whined:</SIZE>

"You're nuts. I never offered to or accepted a debate offer from that guy!"

<SIZE size="150">

Wow. NephilimFree is transforming from Homo Sapiens Sapiens to Gallus Gallus Domesticus right before our astonished eyes. And he claims transistionals never happen.

Come....come and see the show!

Saturday November 13, 2010 at 2pm Central Time​

He refused to taste the Magic Sandwich. Let's bring the entire Delicatessen right into his front lawn!

 

[LordCustos3]

Well, That was Underwhelming.

===UPDATE 11/13/2010: Nephilim's Adventures in Solipsism===
Nephy found a novel way of avoiding the debate he claimed he wanted.
He hosted a call in show....where he didn't take any calls.
Him and a sycophantic yes man performed a 1 1/2-hour audio circle jerk and, Later on, when Nephy ran out of moronic lies to repeat (and didn't have the creativity to invent new moronic lies) He handed control over to SchlockofFraud
All the while, Neph had this frantic, desperate, hunted tone to his voice. It's like he knew the barbarians are at the gate, and they demanded tribute and human sacrificial victims.

The sideshow/undercard was Thickshades. Every fifth line in the chat window was ThickSkull yelling "Happy Cabbie! Unblock Me!" or "Happy Cabbie is a Fatass!" or "Happy Cabbie, Unblock me Pretty Please with a Cherry on Top!"
So what you heard was three creepy creationist liars mutually mastrubating, while the chat window whizzed by at 100 miles and hour, looking like this:


Lapkine: Where's Pooka?
ThickShades: Cabbie! Unblock Me!
SvenManning: Neph Probably Blocked him.
ThickShades: Cabbie! Unblock Me!
nolatitude: Pick up the Phone Neph!
ThickShades: Cabbie! Unblock Me!
PinkProgram: When's is this Primate going to take some calls?
ThickShades: Cabbie! Unblock Me!
TheCurmudgeon: WTF!? When's the circle jerk gonna end and the debate begin?
ThickShades: Cabbie! Unblock Me!
anontarded: TAKE CALLS!
ThickShades: Cabbie! Unblock Me!
MartianGrundy: This is bullshit. I'm outta here.
ICamefortheLulz: BEWBS!

 

[Millennium]

This is the best route to take, because TF will only be wasting his time by arguing with someone who can't. >.<

Well Tf00t isn't the best debater either. I know it's popular to jump on the bandwagon of Tf00t hate right now, and it might seem that I'm just doing that, but it is true. His 'debate' with Comfort proved it.

He is much better at making scathing videos, preferably with science content. He should stick to that.

You can't really judge him off of the one debate with banana man. I would stutter when encountered by such a moron too. The 50 points thing wasn't even a debate.

 

[Anachronous Rex]

Well Tf00t isn't the best debater either. I know it's popular to jump on the bandwagon of Tf00t hate right now, and it might seem that I'm just doing that, but it is true. His 'debate' with Comfort proved it.

He is much better at making scathing videos, preferably with science content. He should stick to that.

You can't really judge him off of the one debate with banana man. I would stutter when encountered by such a moron too. The 50 points thing wasn't even a debate.

To be clear, I'm not saying that Thunder doesn't know how to make a good point, he clearly does. I've just noticed that he does best in a responce format. In live debates he tends to get caught-up on little things. We the audience know that he's made his point clearly and logically, and we can see where he's going, but his opponent doesn't accept some premice or another.

And so he spends several minutes repeating, for his opponent's benefit, what the audience figured out minutes ago; this is, of course, futile, as his opponent will never accept the arguement anyway. He should just move on, but he can't, he has to get his oppoenent to agree with every premice so that he can deliver the fantastic body-blow he's been dreaming of. This will never happen, especially not when the opponent can see where he's going.

They derail him on purpose, and it works.