I'm sorry for not bringing more context to my thread on the title, but here's the gist of it. Recently at my school we had an assembly for a foundation called Rachel's Challenge. It's basically a movement to spread the "teachings" of Rachel Joy Scott, a girl killed in the Columbine Highschool Massacre in 1999. Basically, before being killed she wrote an essay talking about how we should all see the good in everyone and act nice as it starts chain reactions of goodness. Now, I have no problem with this message but the way they delivered it was just so....dicey. Rather than focusing on the main message, they seemed to be trying to make a Christ figure out of her. First they started by saying that she predicted her own deaths with entries in her diary talking about how she didn't expect to live long. Then they went and talked about how she drew this picture with eyes crying out 13 tears representing the 13 deaths resulting from the massacre. They then proceeded to tell us about how a man had a dream of exactly that picture at which point people start gasping and going "OMG she MUST be psychic!". What irks me most is that finally they started comparing the massacre to the holocaust and Rachel to Anne Frank by saying how the two boys who started the shooting were followers of Hitler's ways while simultaneously blaming the media (i.e. tv, violent video games, etc.). They ended by showing baby pictures of her prompting several people to cry at the intense cuteness. The reason I posted this in Religion and Irreligion is because they seemed to be implying that this is all somehow related to Christianity. They made it seem as if Rachel was some completely pure and perfect person who did nothing but good talking about how she saved the lives of so many through her actions. The whole time all I could think of was the parallels between Rachel and Jesus. I'm sorry if I'm not explaining this very well as I haven't had much practice in writing opinion posts. Here's the website for it: http://www.rachelschallenge.org/