Multiverse using inferable reasoning.

[Dacu]

Hi... Basically this is a very old post of mine which I put on philosophyforums.com over a year ago.


The earth is just one of many planets. FACT
We revolve around the sun which is just one of many stars. FACT
We are in one solar system of many in our galaxy. FACT
Our galaxy the milky way is one of many. FACT
Our galaxy is yet again one of many in the universe. FACT
Now, people seem to have a warped sense that there is only one universe, I honestly don't see why since we have those facts, or facts as far as we know.
As we have those facts we can start to link them together and with some logical thinking it isn't hard to see a pattern.
So why would we be limited to one universe as is commonly thought, Cosmologists have a more recent theory about there being multiverses a whole large area which has thousands possibly billions or even trillions of other universes in.
But yet again they have seemingly stopped here, Yes they have established that there is probably a multiverse but what holds the multiverse is something they have even seemed to think of yet.

 

[darthrender2010]

Hi... Basically this is a very old post of mine which I put on philosophyforums.com over a year ago.


The earth is just one of many planets. FACT
We revolve around the sun which is just one of many stars. FACT
We are in one solar system of many in our galaxy. FACT
Our galaxy the milky way is one of many. FACT
Our galaxy is yet again one of many in the universe. FACT
Now, people seem to have a warped sense that there is only one universe, I honestly don't see why since we have those facts, or facts as far as we know.
As we have those facts we can start to link them together and with some logical thinking it isn't hard to see a pattern.
So why would we be limited to one universe as is commonly thought, Cosmologists have a more recent theory about there being multiverses a whole large area which has thousands possibly billions or even trillions of other universes in.
But yet again they have seemingly stopped here, Yes they have established that there is probably a multiverse but what holds the multiverse is something they have even seemed to think of yet.

inference has little to add. sure it may be true, but it also may be true that there is a God. There is equal evidence supporting the multiverse/branes as there is supporting a God. Neither is a scientific claim but a purely speculative one.

 

[Dacu]

inference has little to add. sure it may be true, but it also may be true that there is a God. There is equal evidence supporting the multiverse/branes as there is supporting a God. Neither is a scientific claim but a purely speculative one.

This is true. It is speculative.

However I don't really see how God is a good comparison. Both are speculative but I think my speculation is based on more fact than there is for a God. Since there is virtually no evidence for God at all.

 

[Xulld]

Yes I agree, speculation just the same, but god cannot be modeled mathematically where as various shaped branes can be, so I would say they are not comparable in that sense. Neither may be true of reality, but at least we can model one . . . and perhaps one day potentially falsify it based on those models.