Dragan Glas
Well-Known Member
Greetings,
You've made the claim that everything is due to intelligent design, which requires a designer - therefore, you need to explain how this designer exists.
If you claim that the designer has always existed, we can go one better: Nature has always existed in some shape or form.
Our explanation only requres one thing - Nature.
Yours requires two - Nature, and a deity or deities.
Our one thing beats your two.
Kindest regards,
James
This is simply not the case.Bernhard.visscher said:Dragon glas says :
In order to posit design, you first have to posit a "designer" - and explain how that designer came into being
......
Wrong.
One does not have to explain how that designer came to being to posit intelligent design.
Dragon glad offered zero evidence in his assertion. Zero evidence therefore needed for mine.
You've made the claim that everything is due to intelligent design, which requires a designer - therefore, you need to explain how this designer exists.
If you claim that the designer has always existed, we can go one better: Nature has always existed in some shape or form.
Our explanation only requres one thing - Nature.
Yours requires two - Nature, and a deity or deities.
Our one thing beats your two.
Kindest regards,
James