Link for reference:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wedlwy90XQ&feature=email
The video itself is irrelevant, the person who uploaded the video is challenging skeptics to explain his own personal experience with mediums as well as prove how John Edwards can do the 'incredible' readings he gives.
Im always polite in debates and try to calm people down when they get irate, but despite my patience and effort he decided to call me uneducated and go take a break. Check out the debate in the comments (not too long luckily), i mean he claims to be skeptical but yet his bar for evidence as i described it, qualifies personal evidence as substantiative fact.
I tried pretty much everything including asking his own medium to undergo a test at a local university or science institute. However i think hes dodging the issue and reverting back to john edward. Why do people do that????
pff
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wedlwy90XQ&feature=email
The video itself is irrelevant, the person who uploaded the video is challenging skeptics to explain his own personal experience with mediums as well as prove how John Edwards can do the 'incredible' readings he gives.
Im always polite in debates and try to calm people down when they get irate, but despite my patience and effort he decided to call me uneducated and go take a break. Check out the debate in the comments (not too long luckily), i mean he claims to be skeptical but yet his bar for evidence as i described it, qualifies personal evidence as substantiative fact.
I tried pretty much everything including asking his own medium to undergo a test at a local university or science institute. However i think hes dodging the issue and reverting back to john edward. Why do people do that????
pff