• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

If you were a Creationist what would be your best argument?

arg-fallbackName="Homunclus"/>
sleeping_kittens.jpg


^ how can such cuteness arise by means of natural selection?
 
arg-fallbackName="Zylstra"/>
ImprobableJoe said:
Yeah, because that's convincing... :lol:


Unfortunately, it's enough to scare children into developing a horrible case of religion and other mental defects and complexes
 
arg-fallbackName="FCAAP_Dan"/>
Homunclus said:
sleeping_kittens.jpg


^ how can such cuteness arise by means of natural selection?


green tedtalk on cute sexy and sweet. i'd link it but i'm on my phone. basically nothing intrinsic cute about kittens. I believe it was daniel dennette.
 
arg-fallbackName="Natusaurus"/>
If I were a creationist, I'd probably go for genetics, in a Michael Behe-like fashion, trying to find some principal criterium that makes it impossible for a complex of genes to come about by evolution. Then, I would try to formulate a research question to trace such genetic structures and get together a team to do the work. This, I would try to publish. My goal would be to turn creationism into an actual scientific community rather than a group of frustrated individuals.

I would work by the idea that it is not about having the best argument, but being able to formulate a research program (Lakatos) and creating a competing community able to push its own paradigm (Kuhn).

No matter how silly it turns out, any fact can actually be explained within a creationist paradigm. The trick is getting the scientific community to be satisfied with the explanation.
 
Back
Top