Hytegia peer reviews Creationist paper

[australopithecus]

Perhaps reading the threads would furnish you with an understanding, rather than not reading it then expecting others to tell you?

Hi Austra, just fishing since I did read your martyr comment in another thread and possibly missed your admonishing Hytegia for admitting the thread was actually locked. I hardly believe the claim that this was censorship, hence the reason I went fishing for comments from others on their take.

Fair enough. As for his Paganism there is a whole thread dedicated to it however you'd have to ask him for the specifics of his beliefs.

 

[TheOnlyThing2Fear]

The Hytegia peer reviews Walter Remine thread is in fact locked, and I did not read where Hytegia peer reviewed the Walter Remine paper. This is what we call not straying from one's circle of influence, but allow me to explain...

Hytegia is a pagan (per Austra), and most likely non-religious. Why would a pagan that rejects special creation agree to peer review anything from a creationist that accepts special creation? That's hardly a peer to peer endeavor. Hytegia could have simply ignored the creationist, and taken the more intellectually honest approach of admitting he only peer reviews what his peer's have done research on.

I did learn this one thing from the locked thread and that is Hytegia should definitely not miss any more medical appointments, as it appears the benzodiazepines are wearing off.

 

[TheOnlyThing2Fear]

Fair enough. As for his Paganism there is a whole thread dedicated to it however you'd have to ask him for the specifics of his beliefs.

Thank-you for the referral to the Paganism thread.

 

[australopithecus]

The Hytegia peer reviews Walter Remine thread is in fact locked, and I did not read where Hytegia peer reviewed the Walter Remine paper. This is what we call not straying from one's circle of influence, but allow me to explain...

Hytegia is a pagan (per Austra), and most likely non-religious. Why would a pagan that rejects special creation agree to peer review anything from a creationist that accepts special creation? That's hardly a peer to peer endeavor. Hytegia could have simply ignored the creationist, and taken the more intellectually honest approach of admitting he only peer reviews what his peer's have done research on.

I did learn this one thing from the locked thread and that is Hytegia should definitely not miss any more medical appointments, as it appears the benzodiazepines are wearing off.

Hytegia is religious, he's just not a fundie, and with regards to his peer review what he believes or doesn't isn't relevant. His intention was that YYNJ supply him a creationist paper where he can reproduce the methodology to lead to the conclusion. Remine's paper had no methodology to reproduce, it was a mess of mathematics and misunderstandings of basic evolutionary concepts.

Also, diagnosing mental conditions in people you don't know is a little silly and extremely rude.

 

[TheOnlyThing2Fear]

Also, diagnosing mental conditions in people you don't know is a little silly and extremely rude.

Sorry you misinterpreted my attempt at humor. Perhaps a little less Dr. Pepper would be the right prescription for that. Again just another attempt at humor.

Considering what I read in the locked thread on Walter Remine it would be hard to argue, based on Hytegia's language and vitriol, that my attempt at humoring him was not spot on.

 

[australopithecus]

Whatever Hytegia's manner, the point stands. Address what he says, not his character.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

The Hytegia peer reviews Walter Remine thread is in fact locked, and I did not read where Hytegia peer reviewed the Walter Remine paper. This is what we call not straying from one's circle of influence, but allow me to explain...

Hytegia is a pagan (per Austra), and most likely non-religious. Why would a pagan that rejects special creation agree to peer review anything from a creationist that accepts special creation? That's hardly a peer to peer endeavor. Hytegia could have simply ignored the creationist, and taken the more intellectually honest approach of admitting he only peer reviews what his peer's have done research on.

I did learn this one thing from the locked thread and that is Hytegia should definitely not miss any more medical appointments, as it appears the benzodiazepines are wearing off.

I'm still in the room, you know.

1) I am religious.

2) "Reject" Special Creation - Wow. Reject something that only has apologist criticisms and outstanding statements from all apologist supporting publishers saying that they would reject any evidence that doesn't support it?
That's not how Science works.
In science, the Evidence speaks louder than any man shouting into a crowd about why he's right because the other side is wrong.

3) This is absolute nonsense - what you're saying is the same thing as stating that Christians can only be placed on trial with a Jury of other Christians, since those are their "peers."
Science is different than religion. The Universe doesn't give a damn what you believe - if a Wiccan, an atheist, a Christian, and a Buddhist performed the same test, the same data will be drawn. The only thing that changes is the logic behind the data, in which requires a step-aside and no special pleading... And, you know, to take in all of the damned facts instead of ignoring obvious ones.
Such as Polar Shift.

4) And the Medical appointment was to attempt to get my FFD back on spot so I can get back to disarming bombs and explosives and not this shotty desk job I have now, but all of that is irrelevant.

Considering what I read in the locked thread on Walter Remine it would be hard to argue, based on Hytegia's language and vitriol, that my attempt at humoring him was not spot on.

I don't accept bullshit apologetic science that pleads that it is correct based on the fact that the other side is incorrect, and I'm not a fan of you and your friend's dance and jig routine worthy of a Broadway show in the way you both happily parade around like absolute idiots and then, when challenged, switch to another topic and fade off the topic at hand so you don't actually have to defend the position.

Either tell the truth, or slap your mother for raising a dishonest brat.

My name's Hytegia, and I'm pleased to meet your acquaintance.
Welcome to the League Of Reason.

 

[YesYouNeedJesus]

Here's some poetic justice:

I don't accept bullshit apologetic science that pleads that it is correct based on the fact that the other side is incorrect, and I'm not a fan of you and your friend's dance and jig routine worthy of a Broadway show in the way you both happily parade around like absolute idiots and then, when challenged, switch to another topic and fade off the topic at hand so you don't actually have to defend the position.

Like this thread Hytegia? :lol:

Dr. Humphreys prevails yet again.

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

Here's some poetic justice:

I don't accept bullshit apologetic science that pleads that it is correct based on the fact that the other side is incorrect, and I'm not a fan of you and your friend's dance and jig routine worthy of a Broadway show in the way you both happily parade around like absolute idiots and then, when challenged, switch to another topic and fade off the topic at hand so you don't actually have to defend the position.

Like this thread Hytegia? :lol:

Dr. Humphreys prevails yet again.

I'm looking in the section called Secular Science Publications and Awards.

None of Dr. Humphreys' work nor degree has to do with Relative Physics, nor Geography - he's more of a Physicist grounded within the realms of the Nuclear Sciences. None of his awards, recognitions, or even studies suggest that he's been actively pursuing nor up-to-date upon any of the fields that he's been writing about - such as the Physics involving special relativity models or the Earth's magnetic field.
Though I wouldn't put it out of his ballpark on understanding such things - but then why is a Physicist concerned with an area of work usually associated with a mix of Geology and Geography? And why is he reinventing the wheel and ignoring the evidence that the Earth undergoes polar shift and fails to mention that the measuring methods between when the measurements were first taken and modern-day are extremely different?

And why does he immediately equivocate the data with deterioration or "decay?"

These are all things that were brought up with the conversation with the Geologist.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

Why is this back from the dead?

I have settled this right on the first reply o this topic. You have not address it, you have systematically ignored my posts. I have cut your legs and you still trying to run along as if nothing happened. It is quite hilarious really.
And I am still waiting a reply on Walter Remine: A paper analysis, I hope someone can re-open it so he can reply.

 

[australopithecus]

Consider it unlocked. YYNJ can reply whenever he like.