• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Guns and Violence, A Logical Perspective

arg-fallbackName="BoganUSAFFLClerk"/>
If you had but a modicum of lateral reasoning skill, you might stand a chance of teasing out why this is a damning indictment on the socioeconomic status of the US. That, despite it being the richest country on Earth, it's still functionally a third-world country under pretty much every metric.

Of course, since even the most rudimentary linear reasoning is demonstrably out of your reach, I'll just drop it here as a pointer for others who do have the skills but may not have reverse-engineered the implications as yet.

It's a lovely and, I think (suspect; happy to discover I'm wrong) entirely unassailable conclusion about the asinine exceptionalist blurb promulgated about the laughably tagged 'Land of the Free'.
TLDR keep waffling on and don't make concise points.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
If you had but a modicum of lateral reasoning skill, you might stand a chance of teasing out why this is a damning indictment on the socioeconomic status of the US. That, despite it being the richest country on Earth, it's still functionally a third-world country under pretty much every metric.

Of course, since even the most rudimentary linear reasoning is demonstrably out of your reach, I'll just drop it here as a pointer for others who do have the skills but may not have reverse-engineered the implications as yet.

It's a lovely and, I think (suspect; happy to discover I'm wrong) entirely unassailable conclusion about the asinine exceptionalist blurb promulgated about the laughably tagged 'Land of the Free'.

Apparently, several dozen words is too much for QAnonGuy to read: you have to think in 280 characters if you want him to be able to follow along and respond.
 
arg-fallbackName="BoganUSAFFLClerk"/>
It was pretty easy to revoke 18th amendment that prohibited alcohol in the US, wasn't it?

The bill of rights was created by people. Whether they were part of government or not isn't really important. They're not set in stone, they can be changed if people want them changed. Calling them natural rights doesn't change a thing. What are natural rights anyway?
Big difference in getting agreement in allowing alcohol compared to risking the legal banning of firearms in the U.S..
 
arg-fallbackName="BoganUSAFFLClerk"/>
What about LGBT people? Do those natural rights apply to them? How about blacks or atheists? It seems to me American philosophy has a lot of caveats. As you rightly pointed out, it's all in people's minds and those can change. One can hope.
Yes all of those rights apply to those categories of people.
 
arg-fallbackName="BoganUSAFFLClerk"/>
And non-white immigrants?
What can non white immigrants do that white non immigrants cannot? Legal permanent residents may carry firearms and own firearms legally just like citizens can. They can speak their mind just like the former. I can't think of anything.
 
Back
Top