Popeyewinter
New Member
Hi,
This may be a little controversial and strike disagreement, however I am trying to go about this logically and theoretically. So this is just in theory.
</COLOR>
- This is true because just like a toaster toasts toast, it still needs an operator (a person) in order to complete it's task, so does a gun.
- this should be obvious enough, there's a reason they are criminals.
- This is a good point, for obvious reasons.
- yes this is true, because there is a good enough chance that they will just commit more criminal offences.
I hope I presented this as clearly and logically as possible.
This may be a little controversial and strike disagreement, however I am trying to go about this logically and theoretically. So this is just in theory.
</COLOR>
- Guns don't kill people, people kill people
- This is true because just like a toaster toasts toast, it still needs an operator (a person) in order to complete it's task, so does a gun.
- Criminals will not care about the law
- this should be obvious enough, there's a reason they are criminals.
- People with serious mental issues should not have access to guns, unless under strict supervision
- This is a good point, for obvious reasons.
- People with recent criminal offences should not have access to guns
- yes this is true, because there is a good enough chance that they will just commit more criminal offences.
I hope I presented this as clearly and logically as possible.