Goodscienceforyou cures cancer

[Prolescum]

Lol

I haven't been to that forum in a while, thought I'd check up on the ol' gorilla...

 

[MRaverz]

Oooh cancer. *watches videos*

I attempted to watch this, but his understanding of cancer, evolution and chemotherapy are seriously flawed. It pains me to watch this man speak.

 

[Prolescum]

Well he does believe that chimps are human-gorilla half breeds so...

 

[MRaverz]

Well he does believe that chimps are human-gorilla half breeds so...

Plus, he has been researching this for two years on the INTERNETS.

That's like 15 PhDs worth.

 

[Prolescum]

Not to mention the 200,000 papers he's read on evodelusion.

 

[Anachronous Rex]

And his IQ of 180, let's not forget that...

 

[Prolescum]

Ahem, 181.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

I hate you... I can't take more linking to stupid people. I could have done more productive things with my time like wigle my fingers. Or less intelectually damaging like picking my own brain out and take random stabs to see what happens just for fun. I need to get away from this things... There are a allot of stupid people in the world, I get that, but fuck me if I gona run my life arround that. You can't fix the stupid out of people, I don't believe in miracles. So as long as they are in their dark corner let them be swept under the rug of noone gives damn. (Sorry I'm really exausted today and I have no patience at all and i find this very depressing).

 

[borrofburi]

And his IQ of 180, let's not forget that...

Wait did you come from the GSFY brigade?

 

[kenandkids]

What a freaking idiot! I just looked through squawk's thread on there... omfsm...

Seriously, what the hell can break through this wall of stupid:

So if you can prove 1/ That this crap is really science, by showing me all of the use of the scientific methods in it. I have never seen the use of the scientific method to test any of the belief, in all the papers on this I have read.
What hypothesis(es) was/were tested by what method to prove any of this magic is real?

What methods of science were used to prove even one premise that would be a good start. I have not see it.


2/The only thing I have seen is an indoctrination into the belief long before the first class in school is taken. And without the pre-belief forced into the student, there is no foundation in any of the evidence that would even come close to the idea of creatures coming from less complex creatures and by some magic as they break all the laws of genetics and "mutate" into a new species with new features and new genus.

 

[kenandkids]

Looking through that site I noticed something, many dozens of posts and hundreds of replies all belong to that idiot. It's a vanity site, nothing more. Post after post is nothing more than him replying to himself repeatedly.

 

[Prolescum]

Looking through that site I noticed something, many dozens of posts and hundreds of replies all belong to that idiot. It's a vanity site, nothing more. Post after post is nothing more than him replying to himself repeatedly.

That's because all those who tried to talk to him were eventually banned or left (myself included). I had more than one account... I joined here shortly afterward.

 

[nemesiss]

Ahem, 181.

but most importantly, he's 62 years old!!!!!

but all joking aside, it was like reading Hovinds thesis

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

GoodScienceForYou[/url]"]The original purpose of my deep study of biology and this archaic idea of "Evolution" was to find a cure for cancer. I did. With my IQ of 181 and the fact that I am not going to be around that much longer at 62 years old, I am probably the only one qualified to find this cure by integrating all of science on this cure.

The Dunning-Kruger is strong in this one. I do not think there is a more textbook case of Dunning-Kruger that I have ever seen.

I spent half a summer arguing with GoodScienceForYou two years ago in the comment section of one of his videos. After he saw that I nominated him for a Golden Crockaduck, he blocked me and deleted our whole conversation from his comment section. That was not that big of a loss, it was basically me asking him to define evolution or to cite sources for his opinions and him refusing to define evolution or making excuses for not having citations for his opinions.

 

[Prolescum]

GoodScienceForYou[/url]"]The original purpose of my deep study of biology and this archaic idea of "Evolution" was to find a cure for cancer. I did. With my IQ of 181 and the fact that I am not going to be around that much longer at 62 years old, I am probably the only one qualified to find this cure by integrating all of science on this cure.

The Dunning-Kruger is strong in this one. I do not think there is a more textbook case of Dunning-Kruger that I have ever seen.

I spent half a summer arguing with GoodScienceForYou two years ago in the comment section of one of his videos. After he saw that I nominated him for a Golden Crockaduck, he blocked me and deleted our whole conversation from his comment section. That was not that big of a loss, it was basically me asking him to define evolution or to cite sources for his opinions and him refusing to define evolution or making excuses for not having citations for his opinions.

I riled him up something good and proper, to my shame. Page two is fun.

 

[australopithecus]

Part of me wants to invite him here...

 

[Memeticemetic]

Part of me wants to invite him here...

Part of me wants to stick my genitals in an electrical socket. Let's fight those dark, dark parts of ourselves, shall we?

 

[australopithecus]

:lol:

 

[Logic-Nanaki]

Part of me wants to invite him here...

Me too, but then i can allmost predict a 40 or so paged discussion on how he has not been disprooven while he is plugging his ears going lalalala and telling us to give evidence.

wel....he HAS an IQ of 180 and over 40 years of experience...so he says.

 

[Prolescum]

Part of me wants to invite him here...

Part of me wants to stick my genitals in an electrical socket. Let's fight those dark, dark parts of ourselves, shall we?

:lol: