CowPolitician
New Member
I was always curious about the nature of cherry picking the bible. I personally find it annoying how the religious could easily dismiss whole sections of the bible, saying it was all a metaphor and you cannot read it literally. The religious find this a very convenient device that allows them to bend the rules as much as they like.
However, shouldn't all rules have a double edge sword? If you are going to arrange the rules, you have to apply them consistently. So taking the argument of the bible being filled with metaphors, can't you say that God himself is a metaphor? Outside from the Jefferson bible, why in many interpretations God is the only figure that could be consistently concluded to be the truth?
However, shouldn't all rules have a double edge sword? If you are going to arrange the rules, you have to apply them consistently. So taking the argument of the bible being filled with metaphors, can't you say that God himself is a metaphor? Outside from the Jefferson bible, why in many interpretations God is the only figure that could be consistently concluded to be the truth?