evolutionism isn't science

[C0NSUM3R0F3V0FL35H]

there is ALLOT of evisence supoorting creation andf debonking evolutionism, heee are sone exapples

the Flagella:

the bacteeriel Flagella is an IC stricture, it cannot Evolve

The pasture experements:

Luy pasture did some experements and debunked abiogenesis which is pary of evolutionism (As opposed to Evolution, which is seperate from Abiogenesis)

just to name 2 of approx 452,39,8,5,47,0987,234097,0970,9740,937,9047,389,02730,476,07,43,049

 

[australopithecus]

Well there you have it guys, the bacterial flagellum didn't evolve after all...

:facepalm:

 

[Prolescum]

Dur maibee ALLOT of evisences debonking da konsapt ofapplyeing da sufficks -ism 2 evolution an pretend ASIF it like relly a actual think, bot wut U sed is jubiresh NEways. U cant espect to B takun srsly if U tulk jubiresh.

 

[Welshidiot]

The spelling in the OP is soooo bad that I don't really believe this is a real entity, I think this is a troll or POE.

Btw, check out this guy's other post here.......notice the immaculate spelling? I wonder what the difference is between these two posts...... Maybe they were copy/pasta-d from two completely different sources......

 

[Prolescum]

The spelling in the OP is soooo bad that I don't really believe this is a real entity, I think this is a troll or POE.

Quite.

 

[australopithecus]

Probably, but time will tell.

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

The spelling in the OP is soooo bad that I don't really believe this is a real entity, I think this is a troll or POE.

Seconded.

 

[Master_Ghost_Knight]

I suport that motion.

 

[Nashy19]

In b4, 4 sexdecillion, 523 quindecillion, 985 quattuordecillion, 470 tredecillion, 987 duodecillion, 234 undecillion, 97 decillion, 97 nonillion, 97 octillion, 409 septillion, 379 sextillion, 47 quintillion, 389 quadrillion, 27 trillion, 304 billion, 760 million, 743 thousand and 47 more pieces of evisence.

 

[Laurens]

Anyone who spells examples as 'exapples' is most definitely a troll in my book. Yes, I have a book.

 

[australopithecus]

I don't have a book. I do have a little button that lets me check IPs though...

 

[CosmicJoghurt]

I don't have a book. I do have a little button that lets me check IPs though...

Have you used it on Ad Initium? If so, what are the results, if we may know?

 

[australopithecus]

Sorry, but giving info about other users without a damn good reason isn't how we roll.

 

[Welshidiot]

Sorry, but giving info about other users without a damn good reason isn't how we roll.

Fascist.

 

[Prolescum]

Have you used it on Ad Initium? If so, what are the results, if we may know?

Has your power of observation run out? He probably just posted while pissed or stoned or a combination of the two; his writing style, tone and content wasn't far out of character or idiom, if at all.

 

[Lallapalalable]

this whole thread made my night.

 

[CosmicJoghurt]

Sorry, but giving info about other users without a damn good reason isn't how we roll.

I never asked for any info about any user. So excuse me if I asked for something too secret... which I didn't. Wait... it seems I did, after all.

Oh, well, carry on. Off-topic.

 

[Womble]

Anyone who spells examples as 'exapples' is most definitely a troll in my book. Yes, I have a book.

Thats unfair on the genuine stupid that can't spell examples!

 

[)O( Hytegia )O(]

i am jemuine sirius that evilutionismists are biased he obvioussly rote it all hisself an didnt copypasta it from anothat sorce
like thunderfeet and aaronra does with al their citations papers and stuff

 

[Laurens]

Anyone who spells examples as 'exapples' is most definitely a troll in my book. Yes, I have a book.

Thats unfair on the genuine stupid that can't spell examples!

My point is that 'exapples' looks like the kind of think you'd write if you were deliberately trying to spell things wrong...