• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

"Evidence" for the Nephilim.

arg-fallbackName="Giliell"/>
Tylzen said:
Thank guys for all the guy info.
The guy yielded his claim, and admitted that it was probably hoax after being faced with the enourmous amount of evidence against his claim.

He then said that he thought it was genuine because the person he got it from he trusted.
I suggested that he fact checked materials before he atleast sent them to me.
He told me to do the same thing when I gave him theological interpretations of the Bible.

My mind blew that he compared him having lack of any evidence for his photo claim, and comparing it with The Bible which is open for interpretation.

And saying that he said that he took it as legit because he trusted the person, shows the sort of cult behaviour in religion, that they sucked in by a charasmatic personality.

It doesn't even have to be a problem of "charismatic personality"
It's the good old problem of thinking faith to be a virtue.
"We" usually go for the "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". No matter who makes the claim. I insulted my husband on several ocasions by saying "says who, where, what study". But they're so used to take talking snakes for real on no better evidence than "the bible says so" that they are unable to think critically.

Oh, and even I can see the photoshop...
 
Back
Top