Re: Educating a creationist about what evolution actually is
The problem is that you don´t even understand the issue, I don’t ‘have to do any of that stuff, all I have to do is prove that it is impossible (or extremely unlikely) for 2 independent clades to have suffered from the same mutations 200 times in 30,000,000 years.
But before proving it, I would like to give you the opportunity to prove your statements mathematically, after all you are the one who is making the positive claim, you are the one who is saying that it is possible for 2 independent clades to suffer from the same mutations 200 times.
After you admit that You can´t prove your own assertions, I will prove to you that it is impossible (or very unlikely) 2 such an event to take place.
Rumraket said:Then do it. I dare you to do it. Power up your linux box, do a standard maximum likelihood phylogeny in PAML using 10 species, include bats and dolphins and use their cytochrome-c sequences. Then do the same using any one of those bat and dolphin proteins and then calculate the statistical significance of the incongruence.leroy said:The only controversial point is weather if this discordance is statistically significant or not, but don´t worry Rumraket would provide us with a statistical equation and we would test if this discordance is significant or not.
The problem is that you don´t even understand the issue, I don’t ‘have to do any of that stuff, all I have to do is prove that it is impossible (or extremely unlikely) for 2 independent clades to have suffered from the same mutations 200 times in 30,000,000 years.
But before proving it, I would like to give you the opportunity to prove your statements mathematically, after all you are the one who is making the positive claim, you are the one who is saying that it is possible for 2 independent clades to suffer from the same mutations 200 times.
After you admit that You can´t prove your own assertions, I will prove to you that it is impossible (or very unlikely) 2 such an event to take place.