• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Dragan Glas @ for you only! on the discussion of evolution!

Status
Not open for further replies.
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
you deny that there is no father before our birth ?

As I've made clear many times: the only person who believes this is you. While you cannot provide a single example of me ever saying this, I can provide thousands of examples of you saying it repeatedly across multiple forums over the last 10 years.

It's your manic obsessive assertion - not mine.


yet you love Krishna ? ( waha! )

No, Krishna is an imaginary being - a human projected onto the cosmos and only believed by people due to having been inculcated with that belief from an early age.


and now you ranted, moaned, whinning, yelled a lot and disturbed me without any reasoning.

You are such a drama queen.


yet fun is you will not you will not like me ? what you will not like me ? i dont like you. ( varna sankar )

And again you think that abusing people is scoring you credibility, or something. You sad little man.


your farce maybe was good enough to carry away any foolish person who are fond of getting cheated and will take your side. but not sufficient to move me.

You're too pig ignorant to understand anything - that's why you've ignored my explanation in this thread: because you simply lack the competence.


better luck else where. and rant elsewhere.

I'll do what I like, where I like, when I like, and you will like it or lump it - either way is fine by me.
 
arg-fallbackName="*SD*"/>
How fucking rude and obnoxious does someone have to be to copy and paste from a thread that got locked because of the repetitive posting of dross?

Indeed. I'd put it at probably a good 7/10 on the obnoxious scale.
 
arg-fallbackName="Dragan Glas"/>
Greetings,

demonstrate your hypothesis that HOW your off-shot takes place ? how one room or species turns into another room or species ? just demonstrate your hypothesis now.

because what nonsense you are talking is not practical. so you would you bother to give me demonstration of your hypothesis ? that this off-shot of one room or species turning into another species or room takes place ? would you ?

what an fool people are, that they translated turns into, and give rise. but wont explain how ? nor demonstrate there hypothesis and thinks that everyone else is idiot besides them.

does this makes sense ?
nope, it doesnt makes sense. now demonstrate how this off-shot of one species or one room turns into another room or species ?

but real fun is only such people are fools and no one else.
As Sparhafoc has already explained evolution to you, I refrained from answering.

Did you read his post on page 1? Did you understand it? Do you accept it?

Kindest regards,

James
 
Last edited:
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
I think anning should be confined to one thread—no point in letting them pollute the forum with repeat threads.
 
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
Greetings,


As Sparhafoc has already explained evolution to you, I refrained from answering.

Did you read his post on page 1? Did you understand it? Do you accept it?

Kindest regards,

James

he explained nothing, what an pseudo scientific man you are ? that you still cannot demonstrate your hypothesis that how off-shot or one spieces or one room turns into another room.

what an amazing fun it is that you take the shelter of an rotten apple who is self contradictionary idiot. but - if you still think that he has explained it. than i repeat it again like always ( broken man ) that demonstrate your hypothesis.

since even your darwin and all big big scientists cannot do it. but fun is someone greater than them like you has come to explain it ? waha! what an drama it is.

we are bluffed in the name of science here.
 
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
No, Krishna is an imaginary being - a human projected onto the cosmos and only believed by people due to having been inculcated with that belief from an early age.




You are such a drama queen.




And again you think that abusing people is scoring you credibility, or something. You sad little man.




You're too pig ignorant to understand anything - that's why you've ignored my explanation in this thread: because you simply lack the competence.




I'll do what I like, where I like, when I like, and you will like it or lump it - either way is fine by me.
yet you love Krishna ? waha! there is no father before our birth ? yet i love Krishna ? and you ranted and moaned a lot yet you dont like me ? huh?

what you will not like me ? for i dont like you ( attention seeking @#$@) do you understand that ? i dont like you. i dont care for you, do you understand that ? i do not like you.

now get out, because i frankly i dont like you at all.
 
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
A species is a population of organisms.

That population is spread out over an area.

Among that population is naturally occurring variation.

That variation is genetic, and therefore inheritable.

An allele is one of two, or more, forms of a given gene variant.

Over time (reproductive generations) the population will experience changes in the frequency of the distribution of alleles across that population.

That, with nothing more necessary to add, is how the process of evolution works.

However, we need to go a step further to answer the remainder of your question.

There are 4 types of speciation: allopatric, paripatric, and sympatric.

Allopatric speciation occurs when some physical barrier arises between two parts of the overall population meaning that the groups are separated physically and cannot continue to interbreed. Over generations, the two groups which are reproductively isolated from one and other will accrue novel genetic mutations that spread through the population and will, overall, have a substantively different distribution of alleles that will only continue to grow the longer the two groups are separated. Eventually, the two groups will no longer even be reproductively compatible and will be considered two distinct species.

Peripatric is more about the colonization of a new territory by a subset of the main population which then results in the same barrier to reproduction, and isolation producing speciation.

But there are many ways for it to occur, even large group size and successful spreading over a large area can promote speciation when subgroups no longer frequently interbreed.

All of this is evidenced in thousands of studies, has been observed in the lab (with bacterial studies and fruit flies for example), and in the wild in a population of lizards (for example) and can be corroborated by genetics, and by the discovery of fossils. As mentioned earlier, both biogeographical distribution and comparative anatomy also provide more consilient evidence corroborating the fact of evolution.

so if this allele works automatically without based on anything like genes which we recieve from both parents than when same species like you europeans who are white in your color have sex with another white why dont you give birth you child who is black or brown, chinese, japanese, or brown like us indian ? does this ever worked ?

unless the girl or women was drunk and dont know who had fun with her in orgy or swinger club and had sex with none white. would she give birth to black man ? or brown man ? huh?

now people may look differently from there parents or mostly like there parents if breed is kept pure and didnt got polluted. with some else who is from another race.

so does this allele shows how one room or species turns into another ? nope! it doesnt because it depends on with whom we had sex but so far we look now if you have sex with monkeys or dogs than you will get some horrible diseases instead of giving any off-shot because there are limits of allele and those limits wont allow it to turn one room or speices into another.

so i will still wait if you can demonstrate how this off-shot or one room or species turns into another.

for i dont see anything like whites giving birth to none white people. so how does this allele works ? huh? since i dont see that europeans having sex with another white europeans and giving birth to any chinese either. but fun is allele which has its own limits is used ? waha!

so ultimately you cannot demontrate your hypothesis ? huh? why dont you admit it and save lots of time ? for both yourself and myself ?

admit it that allele has its own limits and white people having sex with another white would never give birth to any chinese or japanese unless they have sex with chinese or japanese. and if you have sex with dogs and apes than you will simply have horrible diseases like gonoria, shyphilis and hiv aids instead of giving any birth to another ape or monkeys.

so your this random off-shot doesnt works at all. but still its good to hear that rose seed can give us mangoes if it is kept or could have sex with mango tree by keeping there roots with each others. for plants have sex like that.
 
Last edited:
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
I think anning should be confined to one thread—no point in letting them pollute the forum with repeat threads.

i think since admin is openly partial and not neutral at all and forcing me and trying to inciting me openly. so anything can happen here which is out of the barriers of reasoning.

so teach me how might makes right works, for i dont know it yet.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
yet you love Krishna ?

No, child. As I told you - Krishna is an imaginary being, and I feel nothing at all about Krishna, any more than I feel about all the other sundry fairies, wizards, hobgoblins and assorted fantasy tales constructed by fearful people to explain the unknown.


waha! there is no father before our birth ?

So you appear to believe for some reason.

You've certainly repeated it enough.

To be honest though, you seem such an ignorant moron, I doubt even you understand what you mean by it.

yet i love Krishna ? and you ranted and moaned a lot yet you dont like me ? huh?

You're a juvenile little twat who hides behind internet anonymity so he doesn't have to face the consequences of his actions - you're a deplorable moron, but I don't hate you - I think you're pathetic. Quite possibly the most juvenile minded person I've ever had the misfortune to encounter.


what you will not like me ? for i dont like you ( attention seeking @#$@) do you understand that ? i dont like you. i dont care for you, do you understand that ? i do not like you.

That's really your entire motivation over the last 10 years - to find strangers to hate on the internet, you pathetic little child.


now get out, because i frankly i dont like you at all.

I could not give two fucks.

I've told you already - you can either like it or lump it, but you have fuck all power and fuck all authority to tell anyone what to do. I expect if you told a dog to 'fetch' it would look askance at you wondering who the fuck you think you are to tell a dog what to do. You're a complete clown, chap - you own nothing here, so it's tough titties for you, isn't it?

I'm going nowhere. You can fuck off if you like though. No one will care.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
he explained nothing,

You clown.

what an pseudo scientific man you are ?

Says the guy arguing for a cosmic sky papa.


that you still cannot demonstrate your hypothesis that how off-shot or one spieces or one room turns into another room.

Already done - if you're too stupid to understand, that's your look out. I can draw pictures in crayon if it will help you?


what an amazing fun it is that you take the shelter of an rotten apple who is self contradictionary idiot. but - if you still think that he has explained it. than i repeat it again like always ( broken man ) that demonstrate your hypothesis.

Any time you feel capable of engaging with some basic honesty - do let us know. Until then, go scurry back under the rock you oozed out from.


since even your darwin and all big big scientists cannot do it.

Clown.

but fun is someone greater than them like you has come to explain it ? waha! what an drama it is.

we are bluffed in the name of science here.

You are a bullshit artist, clown, and moron. That you lack the ability to understand something doesn't make it untrue, it just makes you stupid.
 
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
No, child. As I told you - Krishna is an imaginary being, and I feel nothing at all about Krishna, any more than I feel about all the other sundry fairies, wizards, hobgoblins and assorted fantasy tales constructed by fearful people to explain the unknown.
You can fuck off if you like though. No one will care.

child ? but what mature person would take your childish testimony ? that there is no father before our birth ? just because you havent seen him ? huh? what mature person would ?

huh? now where is admin ? would he not check you ? for you have no rights to say it that fuck off to his forum members ? because its not your private property. and dont act like an attention seeking whore, and i will leave. but you keep rubbing it while pressing your boob. such an competent attention seeking whore you are. so i could not control myself. ;)

now where is admin ? would he not protect forum members like myself ? from the dangerous trolls like you ? huh? who had bullied me a lot by personally attacking me instead of attacking the arguements.
 
Last edited:
arg-fallbackName="anning"/>
You clown.



Says the guy arguing for a cosmic sky papa.




Already done - if you're too stupid to understand, that's your look out. I can draw pictures in crayon if it will help you?




Any time you feel capable of engaging with some basic honesty - do let us know. Until then, go scurry back under the rock you oozed out from.




Clown.



You are a bullshit artist, clown, and moron. That you lack the ability to understand something doesn't make it untrue, it just makes you stupid.

yes i lack the ability to understand it that if white or european people will have sex with another white or europeans than they would never give birth to black, chinese, or any other people. yet fun is allele ? which has its own limits ? it works under great limits because women is field only and its the man who sows the seed into her womb or land. and it depends that what kind or type of man is, if he is black, or chinese, than there are chances that child will or would be black or chinese but mostly look like mother but in all cases black people wont give birth to chienese, nor chienese would give birth to whites europeans or brown indians.

and if you tried sex with dogs and monkeys than you will hiv aids, gonorea, shyphilis etc types of diseases instead of giving any births to any random off-shots. so i dont see anything practical in it that how one room or species turns into another.

so would you try again to demonstrate your hypothesis ? would you ?
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
so if this allele works automatically

LOL

You didn't even manage to finish the first sentence without demonstrating you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about.

Alleles don't 'work' - alleles, as I literally just explained to you in the post you're supposedly replying to, are variations of a given gene.


without based on anything like genes

/point and laugh


which we recieve from both parents than when same species like you europeans who are white in your color have sex with another white why dont you give birth you child who is black or brown, chinese, japanese, or brown like us indian ? does this ever worked ?

It's actually quite possible to have a mutation in a gene causing quite substantial discrepancies in skin pigmentation between parents and children.


unless the girl or women was drunk and dont know who had fun with her in orgy or swinger club and had sex with none white. would she give birth to black man ? or brown man ? huh?

Why would that happen? You are expecting some magical nonsense to occur, so obviously no, that's not going to happen. Being Indian, African, European etc. means you have a host of genetic differences between yourself and someone from another population - so why would someone magically produce someone from another population? All this indicates is how out of your depth you are. Your ignorance is only superseded by your arrogance.


now people may look differently from there parents or mostly like there parents if breed is kept pure and didnt got polluted. with some else who is from another race.

Ugh, you nasty little man.


so does this allele shows how one room or species turns into another ?

/point and laugh

What a complete moron you are. Even when I explained it in such a way a child could understand (for your benefit) - you still can't grasp what an allele is, or what its role is in population genetics.



nope! it doesnt

Of course it doesn't, because it's only your foolish nonsense that suggests otherwise - meanwhile in the real world comprised of competent adults, we're all laughing at your ignorance.


because it depends on with whom we had sex but so far we look now if you have sex with monkeys or dogs than you will get some horrible diseases instead of giving any off-shot because there are limits of allele and those limits wont allow it to turn one room or speices into another.

So your argument is that because humans can't interbreed with dogs, evolution is false?

HAHAHAHHA

What a fucking moron you are.


so i will still wait if you can demonstrate how this off-shot or one room or species turns into another.

I did, feel free to engage honestly whenever you feel like it - or keep demonstrating both bad faith argumentation AND abject fucking ignorance all you like.

Actually, I don't mind either way - I'd be happy to help someone understand, assuming that person has some basic competence (i.e. intellectual maturity) and the willingness to learn - but you have neither. You're a snivelling little bullshit artist who has no interest at all in reality - your entire life is about using the anonimty of the internet to be a twat to strangers, you sorry excuse for a man.


for i dont see anything like whites giving birth to none white people. so how does this allele works ? huh?

HAHHAHAH

You clown.


since i dont see that europeans having sex with another white europeans and giving birth to any chinese either. but fun is allele which has its own limits is used ? waha!

HAHAHHA

You moron.


so ultimately you cannot demontrate your hypothesis ? huh? why dont you admit it and save lots of time ? for both yourself and myself ?

I already demonstrated it - your inability to comprehend what's written means the problem lies with YOU, and your abject fucking ignorance coupled with your hubris. Your silly little troll routine has been shown up - you are just an undereducated moron who gets horny finding people to hate on the internet.


admit it that allele has its own limits

You keep demonstrating that you don't have a fucking clue what you're yammering about.

Alleles don't have 'limits' you complete fucking dong - alleles are variants in a gene.

It's like you just read the first couple of sentences, realized you were clueless, and started yammering thinking you could bluff it - but of course, as I know what I am talking about, your idiotic nonsense is not going to fool me.


and white people having sex with another white would never give birth to any chinese or japanese

Why would they?

Only, you haven't explained why this would notionally occur.

It certainly has nothing to do with my explanation for you, so you're clearly a grossly incompetent buffoon making a tool of himself publicly.


unless they have sex with chinese or japanese. and if you have sex with dogs and apes than you will simply have horrible diseases like gonoria, shyphilis and hiv aids instead of giving any birth to another ape or monkeys.

Sexually transmitted diseases occur between humans, just so you're aware. Not that it's likely it'll ever matter to you as I can't imagine you've got much chance of getting laid.


so your this random off-shot doesnt works at all. but still its good to hear that rose seed can give us mangoes if it is kept or could have sex with mango tree by keeping there roots with each others. for plants have sex like that.

Honestly, I am not sure it's possible for you to ever understand anything - you have to be one of the thickest individuals imaginable.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
child ? but what mature person would take your childish testimony ? that there is no father before our birth ?

That's YOUR claim, not mine.

Why do you believe that there is no father before your birth?

You keep repeating it - you've been repeating it for 10 years across multiple fora like an obsessive little moron, but you've never explained why it is you believe such a manifestly stupid thing.



huh? now where is admin ? would he not check you ? for you have no rights to say it that fuck off to his forum members ? because its not your private property. and dont act like an attention seeking whore, and i will leave. but you keep rubbing it while pressing your boob. such an competent attention seeking whore you are. so i could not control myself. ;)

Fuck off you gibbering troll.


now where is admin ? would he not protect forum members like myself ? from the dangerous trolls like you ? huh? who had bullied me a lot by personally attacking me instead of attacking the arguements.


Fuck off you gibbering troll.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
i think since admin is openly partial and not neutral at all and forcing me and trying to inciting me openly. so anything can happen here which is out of the barriers of reasoning.

so teach me how might makes right works, for i dont know it yet.


SD has been WAY MORE THAN FAIR with you.

Most admins would have booted you out already because you're a mendacious little moronic troll.

But SD believes in free speech and no censorship, which you are very much benefiting from.

So in reality, he IS being neutral and treating you equally.

But that doesn't mean he doesn't think you're a contemptible little moron - being neutral doesn't mean he's not allowed to have opinions, it just means he has to treat everyone equally.

Can you shown ANY evidence of your wantonly trollish accusation?

Of course you can't you lying little fuckwit.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
yes i lack the ability to understand it that if white or european people will have sex with another white or europeans than they would never give birth to black, chinese, or any other people.

Yes, you do lack the ability to understand, which is why you keep jabbering ignorant nonsense that would embarrass a child.


yet fun is allele ? which has its own limits ? it works under great limits because women is field only and its the man who sows the seed into her womb or land. and it depends that what kind or type of man is, if he is black, or chinese, than there are chances that child will or would be black or chinese but mostly look like mother but in all cases black people wont give birth to chienese, nor chienese would give birth to whites europeans or brown indians.

Yeah, so people from a given population have a suite of alleles distinct to that population, ergo when people from two populations mix, the alleles also mix. This should already have been quite clear from my explanation, but you're obviously about as intelligent as a rock, so I understand why you're confused. Confusion must be your normal state of mind given how dense you are.


and if you tried sex with dogs and monkeys than you will hiv aids, gonorea, shyphilis etc types of diseases

Another bizarre idea you've decided to repeat 50 times, even when the first iteration was embarrassingly inept.


instead of giving any births to any random off-shots. so i dont see anything practical in it that how one room or species turns into another.

Evolution isn't pokemon, chap.

No understanding of evolution entails believing that cross-breeding between different species would occur - in fact, I expressly told you this in the post you're supposedly replying to, but you're just too damn stupid to understand...

Allopatric speciation occurs when some physical barrier arises between two parts of the overall population meaning that the groups are separated physically and cannot continue to interbreed. Over generations, the two groups which are reproductively isolated from one and other will accrue novel genetic mutations that spread through the population and will, overall, have a substantively different distribution of alleles that will only continue to grow the longer the two groups are separated. Eventually, the two groups will no longer even be reproductively compatible and will be considered two distinct species.

See?

No, because you're thick. That's why.

so would you try again to demonstrate your hypothesis ? would you ?

Already done - feel free to grow up, mature intellectually, discover some basic moral principles, then come back and have another swing at it.

Until then...

E5t947E.jpg


What a drooling numpty!
 
arg-fallbackName="Greg the Grouper"/>
No, child. As I told you - Krishna is an imaginary being, and I feel nothing at all about Krishna, any more than I feel about all the other sundry fairies, wizards, hobgoblins and assorted fantasy tales constructed by fearful people to explain the unknown.
As an avid D&D player, I feel personally offended by this.
 
arg-fallbackName="Sparhafoc"/>
As long as you can tell the difference between fact and fantasy, then a little imaginative play is only a good thing. Its when you think the contents of your imagination decree reality that shit goes wrong.
 
arg-fallbackName="*SD*"/>
i think since admin is openly partial and not neutral at all and forcing me and trying to inciting me openly. so anything can happen here which is out of the barriers of reasoning.

The only thing "admin" is openly partial to is not having multiple dumpster fire threads brimming with copy-paste unintelligible gibberish. Call me crazy. Are you friends with Otangelo?

Who the fuck do you think you're kidding, anning? YOU are guilty of the aforementioned offences, not anyone else, you and only you.

You've had one thread locked after multiple warnings, you've had 2x temp bans of the shortest period this forum allows for, and all for the same crap. The previous thread was locked because it could no longer serve the purpose for which it was intended, you were invited to make a new thread and start again, and here we are with the same infantile cockwaffle.

Stop telling other members to leave the thread/forum. In case you hadn't noticed for some bizarre reason, this isn't your website.
 
arg-fallbackName="Dragan Glas"/>
Greetings,

This thread is in danger of getting side-tracked like the other one.

Can we please just focus on evolution, and ignore any distractions?

so if this allele works automatically without based on anything like genes which we recieve from both parents than when same species like you europeans who are white in your color have sex with another white why dont you give birth you child who is black or brown, chinese, japanese, or brown like us indian ? does this ever worked ?

unless the girl or women was drunk and dont know who had fun with her in orgy or swinger club and had sex with none white. would she give birth to black man ? or brown man ? huh?

now people may look differently from there parents or mostly like there parents if breed is kept pure and didnt got polluted. with some else who is from another race.

so does this allele shows how one room or species turns into another ? nope! it doesnt because it depends on with whom we had sex but so far we look now if you have sex with monkeys or dogs than you will get some horrible diseases instead of giving any off-shot because there are limits of allele and those limits wont allow it to turn one room or speices into another.

so i will still wait if you can demonstrate how this off-shot or one room or species turns into another.

for i dont see anything like whites giving birth to none white people. so how does this allele works ? huh? since i dont see that europeans having sex with another white europeans and giving birth to any chinese either. but fun is allele which has its own limits is used ? waha!

so ultimately you cannot demontrate your hypothesis ? huh? why dont you admit it and save lots of time ? for both yourself and myself ?

admit it that allele has its own limits and white people having sex with another white would never give birth to any chinese or japanese unless they have sex with chinese or japanese. and if you have sex with dogs and apes than you will simply have horrible diseases like gonoria, shyphilis and hiv aids instead of giving any birth to another ape or monkeys.

so your this random off-shot doesnt works at all. but still its good to hear that rose seed can give us mangoes if it is kept or could have sex with mango tree by keeping there roots with each others. for plants have sex like that.
Anning, you appear to have several misunderstandings about evolution.

You appear to think that evolution works instantly through sex- it doesn't.

1) Evolution works through natural selection - it's the environment that drives evolution. As I explained in the other thread, the environment shapes species in the same way that a vessel shapes the water into which it is poured.

In fact, the full title of Darwin's book is, "On The Origin Of Species, By Natural Selection".

2) It takes very long periods of time for new species to evolve.

Yes, cats don't give birth to dogs - but over a very long period of time (millions of years), small changes will eventually result in a species resembling dogs.

Land animals evolved from fish.

Early on, some members of coast-dwelling fish were able to drag themselves onto beaches for short periods of time to eat something, perhaps insects.

These had an advantage over the other fish.

They passed on the genes allowing their offspring to also drag themselves onto beaches.

Over a very long period of time. through many generations. this resulted in more than one population.

1) The original population of water-only fish (aquatic);
2) A second population that were equally at home in water, and on land (amphibious);
3) A third population that were more at home on land rather than in water (terrestrial).

You start out with one population (species), and end up with three populations (species).

The evolution of whales went the other way - we started out with mammals (particularly a coast-dwelling species), from which an amphibious species evolved, from which an aquatic species evolved

Does this make sense?

Kindest regards,

James
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top