• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Do animals have religion

Leçi

New Member
arg-fallbackName="Leçi"/>
I wonder if animals besides humans believe in a God or Gods or have any superstition. As far as I know some animals like primates have a primitive form of culture, dolphins are pretty smart, elephants return to the same spot where one of their own died so I guess it's not completely impossible for them to have superstition or some sort of belief. Has there been any research about it?
 
arg-fallbackName="Andiferous"/>
They have found evidence that Neanderthal probably did. Neanderthal skeletons were often buried with various items, which in other archaeological investigations (ie Egypt) was associated with belief and preparation for the afterlife. Obviously they are extinct; but they weren't human either.
 
arg-fallbackName="Giliell"/>
Andiferous said:
They have found evidence that Neanderthal probably did. Neanderthal skeletons were often buried with various items, which in other archaeological investigations (ie Egypt) was associated with belief and preparation for the afterlife. Obviously they are extinct; but they weren't human either.
Ehm, yes they were human, they just weren't modern humans. they were our closest cousins and even mixed with our own species (recent studies suggest that a small percentage (some 2%) of Neanderthal DNA is part of the western European genome)

I would wonder how pets who have such close contact with humans like dogs view us, since we seem to posses many of the qualities we ascribe to gods
 
arg-fallbackName="Giliell"/>
lrkun said:
Could you consider, as religion, a wolf howling at the moon?
Do they actually howl at the moon?
I've heard dogs and wolfs howl at all times of day and night (ok, only dogs here) and all times of month
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
lrkun said:
Could you consider, as religion, a wolf howling at the moon?
Howling is long-range communication, so no.

The thing that my cat does where it meows incessantly around each of its feeding times in the mistaken belief that this somehow spurs us into action is certainly superstitious, if not religious.
 
arg-fallbackName="Giliell"/>
Anachronous Rex said:
lrkun said:
Could you consider, as religion, a wolf howling at the moon?
Howling is long-range communication, so no.

The thing that my cat does where it meows incessantly around each of its feeding times in the mistaken belief that this somehow spurs us into action is certainly superstitious, if not religious.
But it's amazingly successful at it, isn't it?
Just like our neighbour's dog was a champion when it came to barking the trash collectors away :D
 
arg-fallbackName="Leçi"/>
As far as I know cats found out that meowing makes us do things they want. Basically cats are controlling us.

About elephants, from wikipedia:
"Elephants are the only species on Earth other than Homo sapiens sapiens and Neanderthals[34] known to have or have had any recognizable ritual around death. They show a keen interest in the bones of their own kind (even unrelated elephants that have died long ago). They are often seen gently investigating the bones with their trunks and feet and remaining very quiet. Sometimes elephants that are completely unrelated to the deceased will still visit their graves.[13] When an elephant is hurt, other elephants (even if they are unrelated) will aid them.[22]

Elephant researcher Martin Meredith recalls an occurrence in his book about a typical elephant death ritual that was witnessed by Anthony Michael Hall, a South African biologist who had studied elephants in Addo, South Africa, for over eight years. The entire family of a dead matriarch, including her young calf, were all gently touching her body with their trunks, trying to lift her. The elephant herd were all rumbling loudly. The calf was observed to be weeping and made sounds that sounded like a scream, but then the entire herd fell incredibly silent. They then began to throw leaves and dirt over the body and broke off tree branches to cover her. They spent the next two days quietly standing over her body. They sometimes had to leave to get water or food, but they would always return.[35]"
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
What qualifies as a religion?

Let's list the elements of a religion.
 
arg-fallbackName="Leçi"/>
I would say behaviour that's brought up by strong emotions and doesn't have any effect on the survival chance of the animals, maybe even decrease the survival chance.
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
kun said:
What qualifies as a religion?

Let's list the elements of a religion.

Religions tend to have a lot of characteristics... normative claims, methods of organizing a society, origin myths, etc. Most are merely true of most religions, and not all.

The one thing that they all do share is the proposal that there is a mechanism by which one might survive death. They, of course, are sometimes not very specific about this, but they all do it. This is usually accompanied by (at the very least) the belief in some sort of great power that is either not empirically verifiable, or not normally discernible.
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
Anachronous Rex said:
kun said:
What qualifies as a religion?

Let's list the elements of a religion.

Religions tend to have a lot of characteristics... normative claims, methods of organizing a society, origin myths, etc. Most are merely true of most religions, and not all.

The one thing that they all do share is the proposal that there is a mechanism by which one might survive death. They, of course, are sometimes not very specific about this, but they all do it. This is usually accompanied by (at the very least) the belief in some sort of great power that is either not empirically verifiable, or not normally discernible.

Based on what you enumerated and what leci enumerated, can we conclude that animals don't have religion?
 
arg-fallbackName="Anachronous Rex"/>
lrkun said:
Based on what you enumerated and what leci enumerated, can we conclude that animals don't have religion?
Actually, I think the elephant example might qualify under my definition. I've seen parents in various species care for long-dead offspring. This seems to me to be nothing more than simple denial of death, and while it is probably at the core of all religion, true religion is a bit more sophisticated then that. It accepts that death occurs (which is probably necessary, as even the religious are not that stupid), but denies the finality of it - proposing some means by which our minds might preserver.

Elephants linger over the ruins of fallen creatures (skeletons often) which they clearly must know to be deceased, and yet treat them with reverence. As though they think some element of the creature's person still remains, a spirit of sorts. If this is indeed what elephants think, something we cannot as yet be sure of, and if they also have some rationalization for doing so, then this rationalization is a religion.

Even if they simply hold that a spirit remains, without any sort of proposed mechanism, then we're still dealing with something that seems intermediary to religion. Perhaps not a true religion, or not a religion in the sense that we are familiar with, but a bit more sophisticated then when an ape mother drags around the mummified corpse of her offspring and cares for it as though it were still alive.
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
Anachronous Rex said:
lrkun said:
Based on what you enumerated and what leci enumerated, can we conclude that animals don't have religion?
Actually, I think the elephant example might qualify under my definition. I've seen parents in various species care for long-dead offspring. This seems to me to be nothing more than simple denial of death, and while it is probably at the core of all religion, true religion is a bit more sophisticated then that. It accepts that death occurs (which is probably necessary, as even the religious are not that stupid), but denies the finality of it - proposing some means by which our minds might preserver.

Elephants linger over the ruins of fallen creatures (skeletons often) which they clearly must know to be deceased, and yet treat them with reverence. As though they think some element of the creature's person still remains, a spirit of sorts. If this is indeed what elephants think, something we cannot as yet be sure of, and if they also have some rationalization for doing so, then this rationalization is a religion.

Even if they simply hold that a spirit remains, without any sort of proposed mechanism, then we're still dealing with something that seems intermediary to religion. Perhaps not a true religion, or not a religion in the sense that we are familiar with, but a bit more sophisticated then when an ape mother drags around the mummified corpse of her offspring and cares for it as though it were still alive.

Maybe they are only attached to the dead and not with the thought it has spirit.
 
arg-fallbackName="Leçi"/>
But why are they attached to the dead? Has there never been studies about it?
 
arg-fallbackName="Cnidarious"/>
I would be interested in
finding out weather religion, or any form of supersition based thinking is
observable in Cephalopod social interaction, or for that matter any
type of ritualistic practice, or weather Supersition is purely a Tetropodal phenomina.
 
arg-fallbackName="lrkun"/>
Cnidarious said:
I would be interested in
finding out weather religion, or any form of supersition based thinking is
observable in Cephalopod social interaction, or for that matter any
type of ritualistic practice, or weather Supersition is purely a Tetropodal phenomina.
Can you provide a link for cephalopod and tetrapod?

P.s. Whether not weather. :3
 
arg-fallbackName="nasher168"/>
Haven't they shown that pigeons can be made to exhibit behaviour that equates to superstition? The researchers waited until a pigeon made a certain action, then dropped a piece of food in and from that point onwards, the pigeons made that action when they wanted food, even though the food was now being released on a timer and the pigeon's actions had no effect on it at all.
I'm sure I read it somewhere, perhaps even in The God Delusion.
 
arg-fallbackName="Giliell"/>
nasher168 said:
Haven't they shown that pigeons can be made to exhibit behaviour that equates to superstition? The researchers waited until a pigeon made a certain action, then dropped a piece of food in and from that point onwards, the pigeons made that action when they wanted food, even though the food was now being released on a timer and the pigeon's actions had no effect on it at all.
I'm sure I read it somewhere, perhaps even in The God Delusion.
I'm not sure, if labellimg that "superstition" isn't too much anthropomorphing.
Thing is, the pigeon is too stupid to realize that its actions have nothing to do with the food release.
It's just like the dog and the trash collector: There's a noise and action going on that the dog perceives as a threat to its pack, so he starts demonstrating agressive behaviour. And behold, the threat disappears. So the dog thinks that its behaviour had the desired effect, even though the trash collectors would have disappeared anyway.
 
arg-fallbackName="Pulsar"/>
Giliell said:
I'm not sure, if labelling that "superstition" isn't too much anthropomorphing.
Maybe it can be labelled a Pavlov effect, or is that too much skylomorphing? ;)
 
Back
Top