• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

CreationistsWON

MillionSword

MillionSword

New Member
arg-fallbackName="MillionSword"/>
Has anyone seen CreationistsWON's latest video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5epqfDzzyIU&feature=sub

I was gonna comment but it's just too stupid I don't know where to start :facepalm:

I'm wondering if this guy is still in contact with shawn because that wouldn't be healthy for him. He seems more concerned with making atheists look bad than anything else.
 
arg-fallbackName="nemesiss"/>
indeed there are alot of things to comment on such as the quality of the video.
i really found it irritating those wiggling text, it gave me sour eyes when i tried to read them.
many of the things he mentioned are either false of failed quote-mines.

and this is pretty much a reason why i don't watch it, a complete waste of more then 10 minutes.
its nothing more then trying to please his audience of often uneducated and/or misinformed viewers.
 
arg-fallbackName="Gnug215"/>
MillionSword said:
Has anyone seen CreationistsWON's latest video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5epqfDzzyIU&feature=sub

I was gonna comment but it's just too stupid I don't know where to start :facepalm:

I'm wondering if this guy is still in contact with shawn because that wouldn't be healthy for him. He seems more concerned with making atheists look bad than anything else.
Click to expand...


Indeed, where to start?

The guy should be ignored.

I mean, "CreationistsWON"? Won what? Seriously? What is this? 3rd grade?
 
arg-fallbackName="IBSpify"/>
I don't even know how you managed to get through the whole video, i had to shut it off after the 2 minute mark of him repeating the lie that Dawkins was afraid to answer that stupid question
 
arg-fallbackName="Zoten001"/>
I couldn't make it passed the first second of the video. The theme park sign killed it. I'm pretty sure these people have been schooled time and again that atheists DO have morals. Last I checked WE don't fly planes into buildings or flog a poor girl 90 times in front of her peers, or ostricize someone who doesn't share the same ideals...
 
arg-fallbackName="kenandkids"/>
Zoten001 said:
I couldn't make it passed the first second of the video. The theme park sign killed it. I'm pretty sure these people have been schooled time and again that atheists DO have morals. Last I checked WE don't fly planes into buildings or flog a poor girl 90 times in front of her peers, or ostricize someone who doesn't share the same ideals...
Click to expand...

hah, says you. I love flying girls, flogging planes and eating ostriches....oh wait...
 
arg-fallbackName="MillionSword"/>
Master_Ghost_Knight said:
What were you expecting from someone who claims victory before even presenting a sound argument?
Click to expand...
I knew exactly what to expect ffrom this guy. I've been subscribed to him for a while now and have debated with him in his comments in the past too. It's just that after seeing this I'm finally getting so fucking sick and tired of it. I just want them to stop it already :evil:

Also theres the fact that some people are trying to help VFX get the help he needs and a lot of us are supporting him and this asshound spouts shit about decieving shawn and his father with clearly no regard for his well-being.

After all, all that matters is that everyone agrees with him, right?
 
arg-fallbackName="nemesiss"/>
i took another look at the video, and i think i found the first biggest flaw and i think i got a good argument;
there comparison of Dawkins and Donexodus2.
the make a bold claim about a certain point which Dawkins supposedly was unable to give a decent answer for which he needed several seconds to answer, while Donexodus2 gave an answer in a video.

besides the obvious answers which they will have too much difficulty accepting; the hoax video, the fact that Donexodus2 video wasn't a interview giving him ample time to construct an argument.

the biggest thing why the construct of their argument is flawed is because they still make the wrong assumption that abiogenesis is part of the evolution theory.
Donexodus2's expertise is abiogenesis while Dawkins is evolution.
its like claiming that an indoor-architecteur and a construction worker are the same.
 
arg-fallbackName="monitoradiation"/>
Garbage video.

Amongst other things, he blames tf00t and dprjones and the such for "promoting [vfx] as if they're not partly responsible for his issues".

I didn't keep watching after he blatantly implied that people who respond to stupid ideas are partly responsible for the stupid ideas themselves. That's asinine.
 
arg-fallbackName="Hwon"/>
Just goes to show that people who don't feel obligated to make sense will feel no shame when they say something stupid.

BTW H won a long LONG time ago.
 
arg-fallbackName="TheDarwinman"/>
Responding [LOL...which is what I'm doing, albeit indirectly] to something so pointless and, for lack of a better word, dumb would lend it some kind of credibility. I imagine if this CreationistsWON came to an open debate they wouldn't be given a second glance.
 
arg-fallbackName="dreddin"/>
lol i'd only just found a vid of his about 30mins ago before i found this topic, the video was entitled creation beats atheism debate or something like that, and in the description he describes atheism as a religion....., enough said about his intelligence (or lack of)
never the less i felt obliged to comment on the video, surprise surprise, comment pending approval, and also voting disabled.
here's the vid..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKzr270FeNA
check out his comments at the top
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top