Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
-
Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Creationist's Take on the Big Bang and Expansionist theory
- Thread starter Pandawa
- Start date
SynapticMisfire
New Member
Re: Creationist's Take on the Big Bang and Expansionist theo
I find that the Conservapedia talk pages are often more entertaining and informative than the articles themselves.
I find that the Conservapedia talk pages are often more entertaining and informative than the articles themselves.
Re: Creationist's Take on the Big Bang and Expansionist theo
It might just be me, but isn't that sentence entirely gibberish.
Intriguingly he also calculates that due to the rate at which the expansion was said to have slowed according to the big bang theory each significant eras according to the time scale of evolutionists correspond to six individual twenty-four hour days corresponding to the days of creation.
It might just be me, but isn't that sentence entirely gibberish.
Re: Creationist's Take on the Big Bang and Expansionist theo
The article itself was written well.
<-- A nice premise that aims to condition the mind of the reader to believe that there was foul play involved.An ancient Russian proverb says: "when money speaks, the truth keeps silent."
The article itself was written well.
SagansHeroes
New Member
Re: Creationist's Take on the Big Bang and Expansionist theo
Which other organisation could get away with mass child molestation, nunnery rape, and questionable ties with the REAL Italian Mafia without so much as a police investigation?
That's a pretty good proverb. Pretty sure there's none much wealthier than the Vatican.lrkun said:<-- A nice premise that aims to condition the mind of the reader to believe that there was foul play involved.An ancient Russian proverb says: "when money speaks, the truth keeps silent."
The article itself was written well.
Which other organisation could get away with mass child molestation, nunnery rape, and questionable ties with the REAL Italian Mafia without so much as a police investigation?
Re: Creationist's Take on the Big Bang and Expansionist theo
Please explain how this is related to the article. ^-^ http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/309
SagansHeroes said:That's a pretty good proverb. Pretty sure there's none much wealthier than the Vatican.
Which other organisation could get away with mass child molestation, nunnery rape, and questionable ties with the REAL Italian Mafia without so much as a police investigation?
Please explain how this is related to the article. ^-^ http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/309
ThetaOmega
New Member
Re: Creationist's Take on the Big Bang and Expansionist theo
The Big Bang model has been "on the brink of collapse" since at least it's formulation. I would imagine apologetics press would have been jumping all over a particle conceived (or as they would say "invented") in 1930 to "fill a gap" in a scientific theory. Especially as this particle wouldn't be detected for 26 years.
There are always gaps in prominent scientific theories, bits of it are wrong or inaccurate. Yes, the idea of "dark matter" is as yet unverified but the proposed ratio of normal matter to dark has been predicted fairly closely from two different fields, cosmology and astrophysics. We may be years off detection, but these theories produce quantitative predictions, we may not have the equipment yet to test them, but when we do the theory will say "it should be there" and if we don't detect it , that's when we're in trouble. When scientists start trying to explain why this particle continues to evade detection, that's when we start heading for real trouble.
The Big Bang model has been "on the brink of collapse" since at least it's formulation. I would imagine apologetics press would have been jumping all over a particle conceived (or as they would say "invented") in 1930 to "fill a gap" in a scientific theory. Especially as this particle wouldn't be detected for 26 years.
There are always gaps in prominent scientific theories, bits of it are wrong or inaccurate. Yes, the idea of "dark matter" is as yet unverified but the proposed ratio of normal matter to dark has been predicted fairly closely from two different fields, cosmology and astrophysics. We may be years off detection, but these theories produce quantitative predictions, we may not have the equipment yet to test them, but when we do the theory will say "it should be there" and if we don't detect it , that's when we're in trouble. When scientists start trying to explain why this particle continues to evade detection, that's when we start heading for real trouble.