• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Consciousness interruptus

nice

New Member
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Part 1:

As an atheist, I know my consciousness comes from a natural process.
My atoms became self aware.

If I die, my atoms will be buried,
then be drawn up by capillary action in the roots of plants.
My atoms will become part of plants.
Later, the plants will be eaten.

Over a long enough time frame, my atoms will be in a new person.

What if, by some chance, my atoms were all there in the new person,
and in the same order they are in now?
A rare occurance for sure,
but over all of infinity it could actually happen a large number of times.

Would that not be me again?
Its the same atoms in the same order, becoming self aware again.

But what if some of the atoms were arranged differently,
such that my hair was a slightly different color?

Is that me?
Maybe not exactly,
yet I didn't even notice the difference
until I looked in the mirror.

That scenario is more likely than every atom being in the same spot.


Example:

Let's say my car engine died, and I took it apart.
I send the pistons to one country to be cleaned,
sent the valves to another country, and so on.

When I put it all back together again, and start it up, is it still my car engine?
Taking it apart and reassembling it didn't change that.

Since all the pistons are identical to each other, it doesn't matter if I switched
the second one with the third one, when reassembling it;
and in the same manner,
every carbon atom is identical to every other carbon atom.
It doesn't matter if some of my carbon atoms are arranged differently in the
future, its still my atoms becoming self aware again,
and I won't even notice the difference.


Time:

It may take a long time before the atoms are reassembled
and reacquire awareness,
yet I will not be aware of the delay.

It's like I pass away, then wake up again as if no time had passed.

I wake up again as if life had never stopped.


Part 2:

Lets make it more interesting.

What if a larger number of my atoms in the future
were arranged differently?

This could happen a lot more often than in the earlier examples.

Now it's less like me, but it's still my atoms being self aware again,
even if my hair color is completely different,
and some of my atoms were misplaced along the way, so I weigh less now.
Maybe a few of somebody elses atoms are in there somewhere too.

If I get hungry, it will still feel the same as it does right now.

At what point are my atoms no longer "me" anymore? How many atoms must
be in an alternate location?

The answer is that it doesn't matter.

The reason is that everybody feels hunger, pain, or pleasure.

In the future, my atoms may be arranged as a male or female,
but they will still have that familiar feeling of being alive again.

So when my atoms reacquire the feeling of being alive,
they won't care if its the "old me" or the "new me",
they just want to eat and have fun.

If they (my atoms) wake up in a future food shortage, they will suffer,
whether or not my hair color is the same, or there
are any other differences.


Distinction:

There is a critical distinction that needs to be made here,
between consciousness (the feeling of being alive)
and memory (a bunch of boring facts like a name or what I had
for breakfast 5 years ago).

A person with amnesia doesn't stop caring about everything
just because the memories are gone. They still have feelings
of pain and pleasure.

The point here is that its necessary to concentrate on
the feeling of being alive, which the atoms will have in
the future; and not dwell on memories (or form).

Trust me, when somebody is starving in a food shortage,
the last thing they care about is
what their name was the last time their atoms
had consciousness.


Problems:

About 80% of the worlds population presently lives in poverty,
and there are a lot of other avoidable problems.
Many problems are likely to get worse in the future.

Food is not the only problem. Many people are having rather
dull lives, missing out on a huge amount of good times
they could be having.

There is a lot we can do about the future, I have found
out how to fix it.


Discussion:

Apparently one of the properties of atoms is that, under certain
conditions, they have the ability to have feelings,
whether feeling pain or pleasure.

I have experienced great pleasure, and
also a lot of suffering. I want my atoms to
avoid unnecessary suffering in the future, and not miss out on
the large amount of pleasure I could have.

The new me may be better than the old me, maybe its smarter, faster,
stronger than before. Or perhaps it will be worse.
Either way, the new me will still feel alive, and will want to
experience pleasure, just like the old me does right now.

If anybody doesn't "get" my meaning when I speak
of awareness, the feeling of being alive, etc,
as distinct from memory,
then I will need to try to explain it better; this is central to
everything.
Failing to fully understand this, means they would
consider the "new me" to be a different person that I should not
care about, whereas nothing could be further from importance.

The "new me" is still just as much me as I am now,
despite any differences,
its still my atoms and my feelings.

I could change my name right now, or wait for my atoms to
be reassembled and given a new name in the future.

I could get gender reassignment surgery now,
or wait for my future atoms to be arranged differently.
It's still "me".

Maybe not exactly me, but the "new me".

The point being that I still care about what happens to me,
regardless of whether we are talking about next week
when most everything is similar, or farther in the future when
my form and name are different.


Conclusion:

Our atoms will regain feelings in the future, just as
they already became aware this time.

Despite amnesia regarding previous awareness, due to
the way memories were stored and lost along the way,
they still feel alive just like they do right now.

But they will still feel great suffering with
the problems that are approaching.

We have one chance to fix the problems
before it becomes impractical.

Your work can tip the balance in favour of success, and it
can be as easy as telling people about this to help us
get started.

If you prefer not to discuss atoms and all that,
you can still help by referring people to the following
site that is working on fixing the problems.

This site has nothing to do with atoms, it is simply about
making sure no child starves ever again, and fixing the
economy so we can have a higher standard of living, etc.

There is only one realistic way to fix the problems,
that would actually work, and stay good,
at:
http://www.endworldsuffering.org

This site can also improve the present, not just the future.
Life could be a lot better than it is right now.


I would like to hear your comments.
If you prefer, you can email me:
moderator2@endworldsuffering.org

Disclaimer: Everything is my opinion, does not represent any
organization I may be associated with, etc.


FAQ:

Question:
Some people say its not the atoms, but the pattern of information
that becomes aware.

Answer:
So what? That pattern will be back again too.

In fact, since a carbon atom can be switched with any other carbon atom
without making any difference, my pattern will be back a much larger
number of times, since it wont matter which atoms are used to make the pattern.


Question:
Won't the universe end at some point?

Answer:
Not necessarily.
Our scientific model of the universe is incomplete.

There is a very good chance that the universe will go on forever,
and this is too great a chance to take. We need to fix the problems
as insurance in case we are stuck here forever.


Question:
Even if the universe lasts forever, won't the sun go out?

Answer:
Yes, but our atoms don't disappear. There are a number of ways
they could end up being used to form new planets and people again.

If part of the universe collapses into a big crunch, this could
form a new big bang.
I say part of the universe, because there
could be a lot more to it that we can't see because it's so
far away that its light hasn't reached us yet.

There could be multiple big bangs going on right now, in various
far away parts of the universe.

So our atoms may not be going away, ever.
And that is just one of a large number of possibilities.

Another thing to consider is that people will likely develop
spaceships, so we could end up travelling to those distant
parts of the universe in person.


References:

[Animals have human style endorphins. Page 110]
Title Taking animals seriously: mental life and moral status
Author David DeGrazia
Publisher Cambridge University Press, 1996
ISBN 0521567602, 9780521567602

[Infinity]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

[Memory]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroanatomy_of_memory

[Photosynthesis]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthesis

[Protein cycle]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/add_gateway/greenworld/recyclingrev1.shtml

[Free will isn't]
http://news.aaas.org/2011_annual_meeting/0225nature-nurture-in-antisocial-behavior.shtml
 
arg-fallbackName="Laurens"/>
nice said:
What if, by some chance, my atoms were all there in the new person,
and in the same order they are in now?
A rare occurance for sure,
but over all of infinity it could actually happen a large number of times.

There are around 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms in a human body (http://education.jlab.org/qa/mathatom_04.html) (I don't know how credible this estimate is, but I'm sure that there are a huge amount of atoms in our bodies).

Now I'm not any good at working out probabilities but I can guess from that number that it would be hugely unlikely that 7 x 10^27 atoms would arrange themselves in exactly the same way as they are arranged in your body.

It is possible, nothing I can think of in the laws of physics would specifically prevent it, but I'd say that it's more likely that humanity would be extinct before it could happen on this Earth because of it's staggering improbability.

If the universe is infinite then atoms would have arranged themselves in exactly the same way as they have done in your body and infinite number of times... But we have no reason to believe that the universe is infinite, at least not in that sense.

Whilst the universe is vast, so you could argue that on some other world out there atoms would arrange themselves in the same way as they are arranged in you, but it is still incredibly unlikely that 7 x 10^27 atoms would just come together that way, and it's also unlikely that billions of years of evolution would take exactly the same course to produce creatures exactly like humans, one of whom happens to be an exact replica of you.

It's not impossible, but I think it is staggeringly unlikely, to the point where it might as well be impossible.

It does raise an interesting question though. I've often thought that if my brain could be exactly replicated on a computer whether my consciousness would somehow be duplicated, and other such things, but right now we do not have the answers, so I'd rather not waste too much of my time speculating.

Laurens
 
arg-fallbackName="nemesiss"/>
let's assume that we could make a list of the atoms that make up your body, not taking into account that atoms go into and out of the body (ie by eating, drinking, pissing, shedding, etc).
say that we were able to track the history of those atoms and we could find a situation in history were all those atoms again had formed a living creature and let's call that living creature "a person"
lets say that "person" was about 100 million years ago and it happened to be a dinosaur, would that mean that YOU are the "reincarnation" of that dinosaur?

there is ALOT of bad logic into those pieces, which are more phylosphical then scientific.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Laurens said:
nice said:
What if, by some chance, my atoms were all there in the new person,
and in the same order they are in now?
A rare occurance for sure,
but over all of infinity it could actually happen a large number of times.
it would be hugely unlikely that 7 x 10^27 atoms would arrange themselves in exactly the same way as they are arranged in your body.

You are right, I only used that as an example to show that our feelings of pain and pleasure could be back again, despite being taken apart and put back together again.

It is far more likely that most of our atoms will be reused in a new person,
and that person will be different in form,
but still have the same basic feelings of pain and pleasure.

This concerns me, since about 80% of the earths population
lives in poverty right now.

When our atoms are reassembled, even with a lot of differences,
they could still feel the same feelings we do now, but we could
find ourselves in a food shortage and a lot of unnecessary suffering.

Would you please help me promote the endworldsuffering.org site
so we can avoid any risk of this happening in the future?

Or I would be happy to discuss any details.

Thank you for your response.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Thank you for your response.
nemesiss said:
lets say that "person" was about 100 million years ago and it happened to be a dinosaur, would that mean that YOU are the "reincarnation" of that dinosaur?

Animals probably feel pain and pleasure too, since they have
the same type of endorphins we have.

So yes, the dinosaur was a living organism with feelings, now its
atoms are in us, and the feelings of hunger, pain, pleasure are back again.

Its not like the old style of reincarnation where a "spirit" or "ghost"
goes exactly from one body to the next.

Its more of a blending, since we all share atoms.

Every time we exhale, we lose carbon atoms in the form of carbon dioxide.
Every time we eat, we get new atoms.

So we are all in this together.

Atoms have already been shown to have some memory:

researchers working with Gerhard Rempe at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics in Garching have stored quantum information in a single atom.

http://www.mpg.de/4290741/Single_Atom

They still need to do a lot more research, but its entirely possible that
atoms have a very small amount of feeling.

And those are our atoms that will be reused for infinity, to make new
people who have our feelings.

The same feelings we have now, just without all the memories.

The logic only seems incomplete since I don't have time to go into
all the details, and indeed, there is more research to be completed.

But the main point is that our feelings may be back again,
in new bodies, forever.

Those future people could be our new bodies, with our feelings.

Lets make sure they don't miss out on any good times.

Lets make sure we don't have to suffer in the future.
Will you discuss the endworldsuffering.org site with me?
 
arg-fallbackName="australopithecus"/>
Quantum information is not memory in the context of cognition. Sorry, but your whole argument is based on faulty logic and misunderstanding quantum physics.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Thank you for your reply.
australopithecus said:
Quantum information is not memory in the context of cognition.

True, but we still do have feelings, and if our bodies are reassembled
then they will still have feelings.

Just like the car engine being reassembled, its the same thing,
even if some pistons were switched.

When our bodies are back in the future, despite however many changes
may have occurred, they still have feelings, and we won't like
being in a food shortage.

Even if there is only a small chance this will happen,
it would be very irresponsible to ignore it.

In any event, we should still want to improve our lives right now.

The improvements I am advocating will benefit everybody,
including us, right now.

Will you please help me promote the endworldsuffering.org site?
 
arg-fallbackName="nasher168"/>
nice said:
When our bodies are back in the future, despite however many changes
may have occurred, they still have feelings, and we won't like
being in a food shortage.

If. Not when. The odds of even most of our atoms reforming into a single organism are so staggeringly, hugely unlikely, I would be highly doubtful that even with the hundreds of billions of years left in which our kind of life could possibly emerge that we will ever see such an occurrence. Maybe it could happen in the case of a few hundred bacteria since the beginning of life on this planet, but I would hazard to say that it has probably never occurred with any macroscopic organisms. Ever.

Will you please help me promote the endworldsuffering.org site?
No. In any case, I don't see how that site has anything even remotely to do with these reincarnation ideas of yours. All it talks about is economic ideas, and not even workable ones at that.
 
arg-fallbackName="Laurens"/>
nice said:
You are right, I only used that as an example to show that our feelings of pain and pleasure could be back again, despite being taken apart and put back together again.

What do you mean our feelings of pain and pleasure could be back again? A future organism might well arise in the future which contains some atoms that were once a part of your body, and that creature might feel pain and pleasure, but they wouldn't be your feelings of pain and pleasure, any more than mine belong to a dinosaur...
It is far more likely that most of our atoms will be reused in a new person,
and that person will be different in form,
but still have the same basic feelings of pain and pleasure.

Again, they might feel pain and pleasure, but that's got nothing to do with you, you will be gone, you will not experience those feelings.
This concerns me, since about 80% of the earths population
lives in poverty right now.

A legitimate concern but nothing to do with the topic at hand.
When our atoms are reassembled, even with a lot of differences,
they could still feel the same feelings we do now, but we could
find ourselves in a food shortage and a lot of unnecessary suffering.

What do you mean the same feelings? Define feelings, and how they would be the same as the things we feel now.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
Laurens said:
What do you mean our feelings of pain and pleasure could be back again? A future organism might well arise in the future which contains some atoms that were once a part of your body, and that creature might feel pain and pleasure, but they wouldn't be your feelings of pain and pleasure

According to my hypothesis, feelings belong to our atoms,
and those atoms will be reused in the future to make our new bodies.

It is basically a scientific version of reincarnation,
but without any religion.

So when our atoms are in our new bodies in the future, its still our
feelings of pain and pleasure, even if we have a different name,
even if we are male or female.

The only thing we lose are our memories.
It's like we get amnesia with our new bodies.

But if we had amnesia right now, we would still feel hungry,
we still want to have pleasure, we still don't want to miss out on
any good things.

Also, we share atoms, every time we exhale we lose some carbon atoms
in the form of carbon dioxide, and we eat more atoms. Because of this,
"my" atoms are the same atoms everybody uses at some point in time.

So we are all in this together.
Laurens said:
What do you mean the same feelings? Define feelings, and how they would be the same as the things we feel now.

I define feelings as the feeling of hunger when we haven't eaten for
a long time, as well as any pain or pleasure.

For example if we are reincarnated in the future food shortage, and
starve for a very long time, that is pain, suffering,
and that is what I am trying to prevent.

It is exactly the same as if we got amnesia, we may not have past memories,
but we still care about what happens to us, especially if we are suffering
pain or starvation; or if we are missing out on some good times.
 
arg-fallbackName="Prolescum"/>
Gibble jocnowobble parf noon a whiner, volup volup triptiddle mynoo. Sterling, baff, notren a limple, fogen et repple.
 
arg-fallbackName="nice"/>
nasher168 said:
The odds of even most of our atoms reforming into a single organism are so staggeringly, hugely unlikely,

Right, but we constantly lose atoms and take in new atoms,
so it doesn't really matter which atoms are used, they all have
feelings.

So we can still have feelings in the future, no matter which atoms
are used.
nasher168 said:
All it talks about is economic ideas, and not even workable ones at that.

There are ways to make the ideas workable.
The economic ideas could start small, like a gated community, then
grow slowly and gradually.

Let me ask, if the world was already divided into a thousand economic
regions like that site wants to do, and they were competing with
each other, do you think it would be better than the system today?

Bear in mind, the benefits of competition are already well documented.

So what I am asking, is do you think it would be difficult to implement
the ideas, or rather that the ideas would not work if they were implemented?
 
arg-fallbackName="australopithecus"/>
nice said:
According to my hypothesis, feelings belong to our atoms...

You don't have a hypothesis, you have a misunderstanding of quantum physics and the inability to cogently define feelings.
 
arg-fallbackName="Laurens"/>
I'm sorry nice, but your reincarnation idea is nonsense.

Atoms have never been demonstrated to hold on to feelings. Yes, the feelings I have are created by atoms and the way that they bond together, but that doesn't mean that those atoms store a memory of them, any more than the atoms on my screen store a memory of every image that has been on it...

All of the atoms that make up your body will not go into making one person, they would most likely go into more than one person, and some of them might go into plants, bacteria, fish, cattle etc

You can redefine the Carbon cycle as 'reincarnation' if you want, but it does nothing to advance the definitions of either of those terms.
 
Back
Top