Can anyone make any sense of this argument

[ShootMyMonkey]

Umm.... if the universe was created outside of the realm of causality, doesn't that leave for the possibility of a non-physical god?

Well, there are two things about this -- one is that it technically leaves room for a non-physical *anything*, not just a god. Part of the tail end of that is that it raises the question of how you define the predicate of "physical." If it merely pertains to the existence within our universe, then that may well be too narrow a definition, since you can theoretically have other universes which are not physical to us, but are physical within themselves.

In my series of posts on the Kalam argument, I dealt in the second part with WLC's assumption that a non-physical cause of the universe must be something timeless, spaceless, immaterial, etc... That's quite a leap, as it so happens, and I demonstrated this by offering a thought experiment as to how something could have absolutely none of the properties his purported god has, and yet can appear to have all of them.

Also, what does it mean to be outside the realm of causality? I mean, is the fluctuation of quantum field energy causal or not? Cause and effect as we know it is more or less a result of the apparently linear flow of time. What happens if you have a universe which only contains spatial dimensions without any temporal component? In a universe like that, it is conceivable that quantum field fluctuations could cause physical substance to exist... what happens if there is a universe with more spatial dimensions such that we don't have the ability to perceive its temporal component? Or perhaps we perceive its temporal component as a spatial one? Would that present any sort of image of causality to us? But for all that, would any of these universes be any less "physical" just because we can't really comprehend the notion of "physics" in any of these domains? Causality aside, if you put it on a matter of the flow of time, then regardless of the model you suppose, if you assume a beginning, then there is some point where the timeline that we are aware of no longer exists, or at least cannot be determined to be there.