thenexttodie
New Member
thenexttodie said:I understand what you mean. You would still need to at least make claim to what objective morals exist and ideally define the source of thier "outside" standard of morality, even if you are only pretending. Without doing so, you would only obfuscate yourself into a nonsensical position.
TJump said:I'm not sure what you mean... if you have a compass that you say points north, and i shake it and it point in a different random direction everytime i shake it, then the compass cant be used as a guide. It makes no difference is north exists or not, i can still demonstrate the compass is broken. This is what i am doing with the moral argument.
I think that it would be hard for you to win a debate with your claim that objective moral values could be grounded in pastarianism without at least identifying what those morals are exactly.
But what do I know? I'm just some stupid Christian.