Laurens
New Member
Just as a brief disclaimer, I don't actually hold the views I am about to express:
Most people would say that charity is a good thing and necessary. There are those however who are against it. At first you might be like "wait, what?", but they do have reasons that are based in ethics.
For example they might argue that charity is simply a treatment of the symptoms of social ills, whereas we should be addressing the root causes of social inequality and problems. Some might even say that charity gets in the way of us attempting to solve the root of the problem. In some ways I agree with this, I think we should aim for a society with no homelessness for example, but obviously I wouldn't want charity to cease providing help to homeless people. We need charity, but we shouldn't let it stop us from trying to tackle the root causes.
In some sense it serves the state, because the state can allow homelessness to persist in the knowledge that charities will help people out. Perhaps a solution would be for charities to put more pressure on the government to address root causes, rather than being there to pick up the pieces for the state.
Do you think being against charity is a valid position to hold? Why/why not?
Most people would say that charity is a good thing and necessary. There are those however who are against it. At first you might be like "wait, what?", but they do have reasons that are based in ethics.
For example they might argue that charity is simply a treatment of the symptoms of social ills, whereas we should be addressing the root causes of social inequality and problems. Some might even say that charity gets in the way of us attempting to solve the root of the problem. In some ways I agree with this, I think we should aim for a society with no homelessness for example, but obviously I wouldn't want charity to cease providing help to homeless people. We need charity, but we shouldn't let it stop us from trying to tackle the root causes.
In some sense it serves the state, because the state can allow homelessness to persist in the knowledge that charities will help people out. Perhaps a solution would be for charities to put more pressure on the government to address root causes, rather than being there to pick up the pieces for the state.
Do you think being against charity is a valid position to hold? Why/why not?