It might be problematic to use language as an analogy for evolution, unless the fact that is an analogy is strongly emphasized.
Language is a construct, and people can actively create new words (neologisms) and grammars. When talking to those unfamiliar with science, the common interpretation through the analogy may cloud the issue. It may be that because the analogy is very familiar, the analogy may overwhelm the facts of evolution and the interpretation that evolution has a "creator" or "active participant" may cause a false impression.
Language is a construct, and people can actively create new words (neologisms) and grammars. When talking to those unfamiliar with science, the common interpretation through the analogy may cloud the issue. It may be that because the analogy is very familiar, the analogy may overwhelm the facts of evolution and the interpretation that evolution has a "creator" or "active participant" may cause a false impression.