MarsCydonia
New Member
I don't want to keep repeating that yours and Craig's defense of the second premise is an appeal-to-a-sense-that-looks-like-intuition-but-is-not-intuition but I really do not seem to possess that sense.Vic 2.0 said:Oh, and I'd like to add that this is NOT an appeal to intuition. Appeal to intuition is when you say to yourself "This makes sense to me, and therefore it's more likely to be true". By contrast, I'm not appealing to ANY initial thought or "common sense". I'm appealing to "senses" in the exact same way we use the word "senses" in our understanding of the PHYSICAL world.
You know what sense I do possess however? Sight.
So prove that your sense-that-looks-like-intuition-but-is-not-intuition is real and that I am simply flawed or lying to myself.