• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Anti-Gravity

I

irmerk

New Member
arg-fallbackName="irmerk"/>
I came across this guys channel a while ago and thought some of the videos has some really interesting content for discussion. Perhaps others have seen these already. Also, I had no idea where to put this one since it could possibly go in conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.
He explains how he thinks anti-gravity can be achieved. So, what do you all think of this concept or any anti-gravity concept as well as this fluid thing, and what do you think about the UFO kind of ideas he puts in the video?
 
arg-fallbackName="irmerk"/>
Also, I would encourage anyone who watches any of his other videos to make similar threads about them, as I have yet to watch all of them. I mean, most have some interesting concepts.
 
arg-fallbackName="Master_Ghost_Knight"/>
It's pseudo-science, he picked up some words and notions of physics and then made it all in a giant mush that doesn't really make any sense.
How did he related magnetism and gravity together? I haven't got a clue.
The magnetism and electric theory are the same because they are 2 different types of variance of the same potential field (in fact they are perpendicular to each other and perpendicular to light), Gravity isn't.
Here is an interesting fact, if you integrate the flux of a field in a closed shape, the result is equal to a the amount of charge inside times a constant, i.e. if you integrate the flux of electric field the result will be the amount electric charge inside times a constant, if you integrate the flux of gravity field the result will be the mass inside times a constant.
If you make a close geometry around the earth and integrate the flux of the electric field (sense the earth is more or less neutral) it will return close to nothing, If you integrate the flux of gravity field in that same geometry it will account all of the mass inside times a constant (which is a very big number).
Integrating the flux of magnetism will always be zero sense they are bipolar (a loop integer however would amount to the amount of current passing through the control surface which your loop outlines times a constant).

To create anti-gravity one would requier to create some form of anti-mass and mass.

But for some reason he leaves that out.
 
arg-fallbackName="Pulsar"/>
Complete bullshit. Gravitomagnetism has nothing to do with anti-gravity nonsense, nor with Podkletnov's bogus claims. Yet another youtube nutcase who thinks he can impress others with pseudoscientific crap, not to mention that Area 51 stuff... I actually hate these guys more than creationists. "Never mind studying actual physics, I'm a genius and I've figured out the real theory! And if others don't believe me, they're morons, afraid to lose their jobs and conspiring against those who uncover the Truth!"
It's an insult to real physicists.
 
arg-fallbackName="irmerk"/>
Well, MGK, I know it might be petty, but I refuse to read any more of your posts until you learn to type and communicate in English.

Pulsar, I kind of figured it might be. I mean, I do not know shit about physics, but I was assuming that if he knew something about the 'pseudo-physics' then he would know something about the real physics? Again, I know nothing of physics, so I would not know how to discern his apparently made up theories from real physics.

It all sounded cool though... Hah.
 
arg-fallbackName="CupOfWater"/>
I find it rather interesting.
Rotating superconcducters does make kinda sence (although I'm no expert in physics...)
 
arg-fallbackName="Trigshot"/>
The concept of anti-gravity itself is somewhat self-contradictory. Anything that has mass has a gravitational field, however weak it may be. In order for a true anti-gravity, you would need something less than the absence of matter, or antimatter. Good Luck. Now if you're talking about a simple hovering mechanism for repelling the forces of gravity, electromagnets work quite well. I believe everyone here has seen the magnetic suspended bullet trains that operate at extreme speeds? This can be considered "anti-gravity."
 
arg-fallbackName="Master_Ghost_Knight"/>
irmerk said:
Well, MGK, I know it might be petty, but I refuse to read any more of your posts until you learn to type and communicate in English.

Pulsar, I kind of figured it might be. I mean, I do not know shit about physics, but I was assuming that if he knew something about the 'pseudo-physics' then he would know something about the real physics? Again, I know nothing of physics, so I would not know how to discern his apparently made up theories from real physics.

It all sounded cool though... Hah.
Click to expand...

What the hell have I done wrong?
 
arg-fallbackName="Pulsar"/>
irmerk said:
It all sounded cool though... Hah.
Click to expand...
Yes, that's the problem with pseudo-physics. Creationism is easy, anyone with half a brain can see through that. But this is much harder. The poster used a bunch of complex formulae to overwhelm people. It all sounds smart, which is a technique to shut critics up. "If you don't agree, you're just too dumb!" Yet it's just hot air.

Btw, MGK's post was great. He used real physics! ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top