• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Anti-evolution Opinion Letters from My City

monitoradiation

New Member
arg-fallbackName="monitoradiation"/>
Hey guys; so my city's trying to pass a dumb bill that parents can pull their kids out of classes that they find insensitive to their religion or somesuch nonsense. Here're two opinion pieces on that anti-evolution bandwagon that I wanted to share; I wrote up a rebuttal but I'm not sure I want to send it to the editor.

Here're two links:

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/opinion/letters/Parents+should+have+child+education/1571665/story.html

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/opinion/letters/What+Scriptures+mandatory/1571666/story.html

I'm sure most of us can tackle this issue fairly well, but I just wanted to share, as these opinion letters were posted on a medium that is different than the internet.

Do you guys think I should write in for a rebuttal? Here's a first draft of what I wrote:
_________________________________________________
"I have a sneaking suspicion that D.M. Hendrickson and Claire Helmers have fallen prey to the anti-evolution bandwagon helmed by the likes of Kent Hovind, and forgotten what "science" and "evolution" really mean.

Science is any systematic human pursuit to acquire knowledge through repeatable hypothesis testing. Science deals in known facts, and any hypothesis must be extensively tested to warrant the coveted title of "theory".

Evolution, on the other hand, is a fact. This is shown through the preponderance of evidence from the fossil record, portrayed in detail by corroborating evidence from numerous fields of science like paleontology, geology and physics. The explanation for the fact of evolution by various mechanisms, the primary of which is natural selection, is called the Theory of Evolution.

How it relates to the human species is the primary reason for denying this fact. Claire Helmers cited the adverse reaction of being linked to "a monkey" while evolution state that humans share a common ancestor with the other great apes. Two clear evidence of this link is Chromosome 2 fusion as well as Endogenal Retroviruses, which can be searched by anyone who cares enough about facts.

Appeal to emotion does not work with facts; we are still apes, whether or not one accepts it. To pull children out of biology classes simply because one disagree with known facts is asinine. The most revealing part of her letter is where she pleads "tolerance" for "religious folks". Tolerance and respect is reserved for individuals, not their opinions regarding known facts. Public schools must be committed to teaching facts, not opinions clouded with religious undertones. If Claire wants children to be shielded from facts, she has the right to place her children in private schools, or homeschool them; but should not delude herself into thinking that she's doing her children any favors.

As for D.M. Hendrickson's vague description of textbooks "[going] beyond what is warranted by the evidence", I suspect he's talking about cosmology, astrophysics, and abiogenesis, which are outside of the purview of evolution. Furthermore, the assumption that biology classes don't already teach "actual characteristics of flora and fauna" is ludicrous. Speciation events occur; one need not look further than flavobacteria for an example. Evolution shows advantages to these characteristics and why they are propagated in the species. To only teach the characteristics rather than how they got there gives one a very superficial understanding of the wondrous diversity of life."
 
arg-fallbackName="richi1173"/>
You should cite at least two more solid speciation events. That will add more weight to your argument.
 
arg-fallbackName="Aught3"/>
Nylonase is an interesting example of a novel trait. Also shouldn't it be endogenous retroviruses?

Otherwise a good letter, I would encourage you to send it in.
 
arg-fallbackName="monitoradiation"/>
Thanks guys for the feedback; yah, I wrote it without bothering with googling so spelling edits is most welcome! thanks you guys.

Edit: Oh yah and I wanted to ask whether or not flavobacteria is an example of a speciation event or merely an example of evolution...
 
arg-fallbackName="desertedcities"/>
Well, it is good, your letter. Though, I 'baaaaawwww'd' when she said this, "Teaching it and preaching it 10,000 times doesn't make it true, it just makes it familiar and easier to believe." It is truly what destroyed her argument, plus the fact that she's ridiculously ignorant. That phrase can be thrown right back at her.

Also, I hate when the talk about evolution and homosexuality in the same sentence... It just makes me face palm, hard.

Oh, and I wouldn't mind taking a 'Scripture 101' class. It'd probably make it easier for me to call BS. Also, it couldn't be so. Unconstitutional after all.
 
arg-fallbackName="Josan"/>
I rage at this comment
Rob Wakarchuk ("Rush toward ignorance") suggests evolution must be inflicted on everyone because it "has yet to be disproven." One could teach a lot of things on that basis. And he says it is as solidly established as the fact that the Earth revolves around the Sun. Very funny.

It is quite offensive...

And, I would also like to say that if such a law ever was passed, then children who are pulled out of biology classrooms should get an incomplete in biology and fail to gradute. They are simply missing a part of their education, so why should they get a pass that officaly says they don't?
 
arg-fallbackName="irmerk"/>
Perhaps suggest that they actually look into whether or not evolution is a supported fact and if it actually links to the said correlated - through unjustified connotation - terms and concepts such as abiogenesis and 'cosmos genesis' to verify their hatred for the ever improving and self correcting process we call science as well as differentiate the tolerance of homosexuality from the theory of evolution while comparing the intolerance with the said predisposition due to a preformed opinion from it's current prevalence to the exact same intolerance we found forty years ago during the civil rights movement and explain how neither argument of sticking to the tradition of hatred makes sense.

But, yeah, send it in.

Edit: I don't even think that was a run on sentence!
 
arg-fallbackName="Shapeshifter"/>
Make sure you read this guide on how to write to an editor. It's a very good guide on how a letter should look like for maximum impact.
 
Back
Top