• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

Another wanna-debate me

arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
Wolfbitn said:
he_who_is_nobody said:
[

I alone placed a link to this thread three times on your YouTube channel. Once in two of your videos and once on the discussion section of your YouTube channel. However, it would be nice if you answered SpecialFrog's question.

No, no one told me he was here talking behind my back.. and i dont know who you are.. but i do know youre not acepting the challenge either

Again, I posted it three times to your YouTube channel.

If you answered my earlier question, the thought of a debate could be discussed. I asked why should anyone entertain the idea of having a debate with you? Who are you, besides another internet nobody like the rest of us? Are you just trying to raise your "brand" or do you have something new to say?

Beyond that, please answer SpecialFrog's question as well.
 
arg-fallbackName="DutchLiam84"/>
Wolfbitn said:
Aron, hi.. i see you like to talk behind people's back after you ran from a live on air debate :)
..I challenge you right here right now, live and on air, me against you, the question we will debate is "is evolution just your imagination?" Of course i know to expect nothing but posturing from you as you slither away from a public embarrassment :)
For the other keyboard cowboy wanna be's i see posting in this thread, put yourself a team together and i will take absolutely every one of you on this topic of debate.. mono vs all of you isnt fair, but you cant muster much more than whats here im afraid. His little buddies on his youtube channel abandoned him even
How about you don't come in swinging your verbal gun like a mad man and simply introduce yourself calmly and respectfully, you know, like a normal, social human being? My advice for you: calm the fuck down, behave like a normal person, drop the hostility and get to know us first.

This is what you remind me of:
overly-confident-8.gif


And no, I won't accept your challenge either. You've given us 0 reasons why we should!
 
arg-fallbackName="Mugnuts"/>
Wolfbitn said:
I was very civil with him on youtube.. then he wanted to act condescending and i called him on his condescension.
No one is obligated youre right.. but even self respect obligates him to a better standard than to run from me on youtube, and then come here lying and talking shit behind people's back.

My offer for live on air debate stands for anyone here or even any number of people here, while he hides until he can talk behind my back again

If you would care to re-read the content of what this thread is, everything was a direct cut/paste of your words or a link to your words as you yourself wrote them. It would be very easy to point out lies and untruths however they would all still be yours.

As we had already read from your words, we all predicted as much. You came out swinging like a drunk looking for a bar fight yet all you will get is pwnage to all antics.

I also highly doubt anyone wants to listen to you screaming gibberish live on air, as you've proven to be the Internet equivelant of a bell ringer wearing an 'End is nigh' sandwich board. Do people flock to hear their words or do they just keep jogging on....
 
arg-fallbackName="Laurens"/>
Pro tip: If you would like to get people to accept a request ask them nicely.

If you want us to debate live you need to give some indication that it would be a worthwhile activity. Coming here with a bee in your bonnet and an attitude problem is not going to work, it only gives us a hint as to what the debate would be like. No one wants an ill natured debate with a bad mannered person.

Being civil gets you a long way.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
 
arg-fallbackName="Prolescum"/>
Given that the suggestion appeared, I Googled our newest member. He's as generic a conspiracy theorist as one can be. I imagine live discussions with him would be a blended bowl of word salad with Gish dressing.

Sent from the edge of the time vortex
 
arg-fallbackName="Dragan Glas"/>
Greetings,

Wolfbitn, having watched a number of your videos, and listened to your litany of insults against atheists and those who accept (the theory of) evolution, which are clearly based on wilful ignorance, I wonder why you expect anyone to bother responding to your "challenge"?

I can't see such a "debate" going any different than this one...







Your videos show that you suffer from much the same basic misconceptions as "Andy from Bristol".

If I may ask, what do you understand by the term "transitional fossil"?

Kindest regards,

James
 
arg-fallbackName="Gnug215"/>
Eric Wolfbitn Jewell said:
Youtube.. someone in your ranks loves to play games with numbers. You keep cutting the number of views on my videos by MORE THAN HALF every day. Do i need to start taking screenshots and sue?

From a comment of his on one of his YouTube videos. Seriously.

(The video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHuRNuJT94Q )


The most ridiculous thing about that comment isn't so much that the view numbers may vary (I for one would want to unsee the vid and retract my view count of it... ), but more the fact that he thinks he can sue over it. And he's talking about a video that has under 600 views after a little more than a month.
That's the level of delusion we're dealing with here. He also claims to be former military intelligence... yeah...

In my view, the guy isn't really a "serious" Creationist. He's a conspiracy-theory nutjob. Not worth anyone's time.
 
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
Gnug215 said:
In my view, the guy isn't really a "serious" Creationist. He's a conspiracy-theory nutjob. Not worth anyone's time.

It would surprise you how common it is to see just how many creationist promoters also believe several conspiracy theories. From governments being influence by satanic illuminati to simple anti-vaxxier/9/11 Truther belief. Last night, I just finish watching my current guilty pleasure creationist talk about the “magic bullet” theory and JFK. When one pulls on the thread of creationism, a lot of bunk will soon come with it.
 
arg-fallbackName="Gnug215"/>
he_who_is_nobody said:
Gnug215 said:
In my view, the guy isn't really a "serious" Creationist. He's a conspiracy-theory nutjob. Not worth anyone's time.

It would surprise you how common it is to see just how many creationist promoters also believe several conspiracy theories. From governments being influence by satanic illuminati to simple anti-vaxxier/9/11 Truther belief. Last night, I just finish watching my current guilty pleasure creationist talk about the “magic bullet” theory and JFK. When one pulls on the thread of creationism, a lot of bunk will soon come with it.

Actually, no... insanity and delusion tend to come in bulk, and I know that. But what I mean about this particular guy is that he seems to be a conspiracy-theorist first, and Creationist second. His creationism doesn't seem to have come about as a result of his Christian faith, but rather as this kind of anti-world-authority-conspiracy nuttery.

I looked around a bit, and he's dipped his theoretical toes in all kinds of crazy sauce.
 
Back
Top