A claim often made in ignorance by fundamentalist theists is that atheism is a new idea, or that it's never been popular or important.
Of course, as with much of the rest of their assertions, this is formed by inspection of the fluff in their navel and is contradicted by evidence and reality.
In the real world, non-belief is an ancient tradition found all across the world wherever religious authorities didn't have the authority to torture and murder the heathen.
So this thread's aim is to cite excerpts from the past exposing the depth of non-theistic thinking back through human history.
There are thousands of such texts, and I couldn't hope to be comprehensive, but what I show will be sufficient to put an end to any similar claim in the future.
To start:
The first quote here is by Lucretius, written about 2050 years ago, was an Epicurean response to the god question. It's far too long to reproduce entirely, so a short piece and a link:
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0131%3Abook%3D1%3Acard%3D1
De Rerum Natura
Often transliterated as:
Next up, an even more compelling example, a complete poem in a play addressing the nature of belief in gods, written by an unknown author (probably Euripides) but placed in the mouth of a character in Plato's plays.
https://people.wku.edu/jan.garrett/302/critias.htm
Or to summarize: Man invented fear of the gods for mortals, so the wicked would have something to fear
We can find examples all over the world from recorded history. 2 of the primary schools of Hindu thought are explicitly atheist, and one other is agnostic.
The 10th chapter of the Nasadiya Sukta (Creation Hymn) in the Rig Veda:
The Samkhyakarika is an explicitly atheistic school of religious thought: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhyakarika
Paramārtha, in the 6th century, translated the work into Chinese, giving us a surviving record:
Funny how people around the world had already address the KCA, even though some theists think it's still noteworthy today. The uncaused causer, still blinding theists to their own inconsistencies.
The Carvaka school was also expressly atheistic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charvaka
Sarvasiddhanta Samgraha, Verse 8
Vidyaranya, from the south of India in the 14th century wrote:
Kazimierz Lyszczynski, a 17th century Polish philosopher charged by the Catholic Church for heresy and executed because he wouldn't conform to the utterly pathetic idea of the Christian narrative, wrote this in De non existentia Dei:
Thomas Paine in the 18th century wrote much about the absurdity of Christianity and of organized religion
Let's keep collecting them here.
What's important to establish, and something that some theists think they can simply assert is false, is that atheism and non-belief in divine entities has as long a pedigree as belief.
Atheism has existed exactly as long as there has been religion, not a moment more, not a moment less. I have no doubt there are just as many atheists who would disagree with this (on account of the assumption of implicit atheism) as there are theists who pretend to themselves that atheism is a modern phenomenon.
Of course, as with much of the rest of their assertions, this is formed by inspection of the fluff in their navel and is contradicted by evidence and reality.
In the real world, non-belief is an ancient tradition found all across the world wherever religious authorities didn't have the authority to torture and murder the heathen.
So this thread's aim is to cite excerpts from the past exposing the depth of non-theistic thinking back through human history.
There are thousands of such texts, and I couldn't hope to be comprehensive, but what I show will be sufficient to put an end to any similar claim in the future.
To start:
The first quote here is by Lucretius, written about 2050 years ago, was an Epicurean response to the god question. It's far too long to reproduce entirely, so a short piece and a link:
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0131%3Abook%3D1%3Acard%3D1
De Rerum Natura
That in no wise the nature of the world
For us was builded by a power divine-
So great the faults it stands encumbered with
Often transliterated as:
Had God designed the world, it would not be
A world so frail and faulty as we see.
Next up, an even more compelling example, a complete poem in a play addressing the nature of belief in gods, written by an unknown author (probably Euripides) but placed in the mouth of a character in Plato's plays.
https://people.wku.edu/jan.garrett/302/critias.htm
1 A time there was when disorder ruled
Human lives, which were then, like lives of beasts,
Enslaved to force; nor was there then reward
For the good, nor for the wicked punishment.
5 Next, it seems to me, humans established laws
For punishment, that justice might rule
Over the tribe of mortals, and wanton injury be subdued;
And whosoever did wrong was penalized.
Next, as the laws held [mortals] back from deeds
10 Of open violence, but still such deeds
Were done in secret,—then, I think,
Some shrewd man first, a man in judgment wise,
Found for mortals the fear of gods,
Thereby to frighten the wicked should they
15 Even act or speak or scheme in secret.
Hence it was that he introduced the divine
Telling how the divinity enjoys endless life,
Hears and sees, and takes thought
And attends to things, and his nature is divine,
20 So that everything which mortals say is heard
And everything done is visible.
Even if you plan in silence some evil deed
It will not be hidden from the gods: for discernment
Lies in them. So, speaking words like these,
25 The sweetest teaching did he introduce,
Concealing truth under untrue speech.
The place he spoke of as the gods' abode
Was that by which he might awe humans most,—
The place from which, he knew, terrors came to mortals
30 And things advantageous in their wearisome life—
The revolving heaven above, in which dwell
The lightnings, and awesome claps
Of thunder, and the starry face of heaven,
Beautiful and intricate by that wise craftsman Time,—
35 From which, too, the meteor's glowing mass speeds
And wet thunderstorm pours forth upon the earth.
Such were the fears with which he surrounded mortals,
And to the divinity he gave a fitting home,
By this his speech, and in a fitting place,
40 And [thus] extinguished lawlessness by laws.
Or to summarize: Man invented fear of the gods for mortals, so the wicked would have something to fear
We can find examples all over the world from recorded history. 2 of the primary schools of Hindu thought are explicitly atheist, and one other is agnostic.
The 10th chapter of the Nasadiya Sukta (Creation Hymn) in the Rig Veda:
Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation?
The gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe.
The Samkhyakarika is an explicitly atheistic school of religious thought: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhyakarika
Paramārtha, in the 6th century, translated the work into Chinese, giving us a surviving record:
You say that God is the cause. This is not correct. Why so? Since He is without genetic constituents (Guna). God does not possess the three genetic constituents, whereas the world does possess the three genetic constituents. The cause and the effect would not resemble each other; therefore God is not the cause.
Funny how people around the world had already address the KCA, even though some theists think it's still noteworthy today. The uncaused causer, still blinding theists to their own inconsistencies.
The Carvaka school was also expressly atheistic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charvaka
There is no other world other than this;
There is no heaven and no hell;
The realm of Shiva and like regions,
are invented by stupid imposters.
Sarvasiddhanta Samgraha, Verse 8
Vidyaranya, from the south of India in the 14th century wrote:
but how can we attribute to the Divine Being the giving of supreme felicity, when such a notion has been utterly abolished by Charvaka, the crest-gem of the atheistic school, the follower of the doctrine of Brihaspati? The efforts of Charvaka are indeed hard to be eradicated, for the majority of living beings hold by the current refrain:
While life is yours, live joyously;
None can escape Death's searching eye:
When once this frame of ours they burn,
How shall it e'er again return?
Kazimierz Lyszczynski, a 17th century Polish philosopher charged by the Catholic Church for heresy and executed because he wouldn't conform to the utterly pathetic idea of the Christian narrative, wrote this in De non existentia Dei:
II - the Man is a creator of God, and God is a concept and creation of a Man. Hence the people are architects and engineers of God and God is not a true being, but a being existing only within mind, being chimaeric by its nature, because a God and a chimaera are the same.
IV - simple folk are cheated by the more cunning with the fabrication of God for their own oppression; whereas the same oppression is shielded by the folk in a way, that if the wise attempted to free them by the truth, they would be quelled by the very people
Thomas Paine in the 18th century wrote much about the absurdity of Christianity and of organized religion
The world is my country, all mankind my brethren, to do good is my religion
The character of Moses, as stated in the Bible, is the most horrid that can be imagined. If those accounts be true, he was the wretch that first began and carried on wars on the score or on the pretence of religion; and under that mask, or that infatuation, committed the most unexampled atrocities that are to be found in the history of any nation.
...
Among the detestable villains that in any period of the world have disgraced the name of man, it is impossible to find a greater than Moses, if this account be true. Here is an order to butcher the boys, to massacre the mothers, and debauch the daughters.
Let's keep collecting them here.
What's important to establish, and something that some theists think they can simply assert is false, is that atheism and non-belief in divine entities has as long a pedigree as belief.
Atheism has existed exactly as long as there has been religion, not a moment more, not a moment less. I have no doubt there are just as many atheists who would disagree with this (on account of the assumption of implicit atheism) as there are theists who pretend to themselves that atheism is a modern phenomenon.