AlienScientist: genius or insane?

GuppyPal

New Member
Here's one of his videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wT7zM8XgXQ

He seems to have a pretty good understanding of physics, but he's certain aliens are here and the government is hiding them from us. I have my own opinions but would like to hear others' before I taint the pool.
 

GuppyPal

New Member
haha, whoops! This is the video I meant to put up. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJJ-4lnwrck&feature=channel_page
 

bipolarGod

New Member
Well he definately has a knowledge of physics, no doubt about it. Maybe he is a little fixated on this whole "flying saucer" thing. His experiment although it contains some very well grounded theory behind it, is probably not practical. I would suggest a book called "Gravito-Hydromagnetics" by Brian Punsley. Have him look at that and then tell me where he bases some of the more of his more practical applications first.
 
ßipolarGod said:
Anyone else got an opinion on this guy? I'd like to hear them.
The guys is prety much a troll and guilty of fallacy by attempted association, he steals some sounding ideas from good physics and because some ideas are sound it builds up the idea that he knows what he is talking about and what he is saying might be true. But then he throws simply a bucket full of misconception, falsehood, misconceptions and other stupid things (in short: full of bullshit) and because the previous was sound an illiterate on the subject may be falsely lead to the conclusion that the bull is also sound. If you notice he prety much just says correct things when he is not saying anything about the point he is trying to present.
In short he is a very powerfull subject to lead the deluded tinfoil hats sheep, but that is just it.
 

GuppyPal

New Member
Master_Ghost_Knight said:
ßipolarGod said:
Anyone else got an opinion on this guy? I'd like to hear them.
The guys is prety much a troll and guilty of fallacy by attempted association, he steals some sounding ideas from good physics and because some ideas are sound it builds up the idea that he knows what he is talking about and what he is saying might be true. But then he throws simply a bucket full of misconception, falsehood, misconceptions and other stupid things (in short: full of bullshit) and because the previous was sound an illiterate on the subject may be falsely lead to the conclusion that the bull is also sound. If you notice he prety much just says correct things when he is not saying anything about the point he is trying to present.
In short he is a very powerfull subject to lead the deluded tinfoil hats sheep, but that is just it.
Pretty much what I thought.
 

bipolarGod

New Member
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8IcciRHGvQ&feature=channel

See now this guy is on the right track and isn't rambling about different theories without ever really making a point. I like how explains the idea of the of the ultimate entanglement of protons through vacuums to every other proton in the universe. Also how he explains the Shwartzchild condition for the orbital velocity of two protons by calculating the relative velocity of the protons via given mass and acceleration which coincidentally gave us the speed of light!
This guy knows a little more about what he's talking about.
 
ßipolarGod said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8IcciRHGvQ&feature=channel

See now this guy is on the right track and isn't rambling about different theories without ever really making a point. I like how explains the idea of the of the ultimate entanglement of protons through vacuums to every other proton in the universe. Also how he explains the Shwartzchild condition for the orbital velocity of two protons by calculating the relative velocity of the protons via given mass and acceleration which coincidentally gave us the speed of light!
This guy knows a little more about what he's talking about.
First of all they are not 2 protons as protons do not weight 885 million tones (just in case you didn't noticed), they are 2 "poseudo-protons" that he calculated that it would be necessary to create a black hole (at least by his calculations). Then using that mass (and aparently also using Newtonian gravity instead of the relativistic) he claculated what the orbital speed would have to be, it really doesn't take a genius to find out what is the orbital speed of anything that close to a blackhole would be does it? (is it a revealing coincidence or he just chose the number to make it fit?) Even if he arrived to that in a honest fashion it wouldn't mean anything. This was prety much rubish. The only thing he got right was when he aparently knew that p=m/vk, the rest was prety much giberish, and the more I see it the less I see it as anything resembling a mediocre answer.

It is just a juggling trick to amuse the croud. Seeing that thing just prety much makes you more stupid.
 

drbob

New Member
Hi guys,

My Name is Dr Bob
I am someone who is claiming to be a 6 year old shi-tzu working on green energy devices in my secret laboratory.
(Science is close to my heard however I take a relaxed approach to it)

I recently went on an America tour to do research on Cold Fusion / Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reactions since there has been so much talk about it the last 2 years.

I meet with AlienScientist at MIT and went out to dinner with him.

I have not had time to look at much of his work, I know he touches down on many many controversial areas of science and information. We mostly spoke about blogging, seo and how internet can be used for the better of good to spread information.


My impression of him is that he is a super nice guy, unselfish, well spoken and well educated.
He took me around Boston in his car, invited me for dinner and to his friends and hooked me up with very interesting people.

Is he a genius or insane.... probably both! ... but he is really a super nice human being, unselfish and with very good intentions.

/ Peace Dr Bob
 
Top