There is no legal mechanism in English law which permits a judge to be held accountable for making a mistake in a judgment; there's the judicial review, which sounds fine until you learn that the only matter a review will consider is the conduct of the judge, not his integrity or competence. A judge cannot be sued, as there is no precedent. The Supreme Court exists as the last point of appeal and is independent of Parliament. Judges are selected, not elected, by the Judicial Appointments Commission who are themselves not elected but selected by 'an independent appointment panel' whose membership and fitness for purpose is not made known in the public domain. The Secretary of State 'suggests' a nominee as Chair and this is accepted without question.
Therefore, those given authoritarian license under the law to dispense justice to the rest of us are unaccountable save to their own profession and the path to disciplining a judge is nigh on impossible because there is no provision for doing so. There is no justice, only the Law, and thus in the UK we live in an Orwellian collective dictatorship where human rights are merely lip service. The Law exists only to sustain itself.
Therefore, those given authoritarian license under the law to dispense justice to the rest of us are unaccountable save to their own profession and the path to disciplining a judge is nigh on impossible because there is no provision for doing so. There is no justice, only the Law, and thus in the UK we live in an Orwellian collective dictatorship where human rights are merely lip service. The Law exists only to sustain itself.