It's hilarious how some wacky religious people want to be like william craig, they create their own "argument"
if you haven't heard of it, it's this so-called "elliot argument" by fivethirty who calls himself... the "atheist killa"
this so-called argument has some additional notes.
I didn't make this up, this guy says it himself!
1- it's only for atheists who actually believe that our physical universe really exists.
2 - it's only to be used against atheists.
in his own words: "the elliot argument is designed to conquer, defeat, destroy, demolish, disassemble atheism, not agnostics"
source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqjkaD0OC1E
if you want to watch his video, he takes FOREVER to make his argument...
so here is his so-called argument:
premise #1: BOTH STE AND SCPNCEU ARE IRRATIONAL ILLOGICAL AND HAVE ZERO EVIDENCE.
premise #2: IF YOU DENY OR DISBELIEVE IN AN UNCREATED CREATOR OPTION AS THE CAUSE OF THE UNIVERSE, THEN YOUR ONLY TWO OPTIONS ARE STE AND SCPNCEU.
premise #3: ATHEIST DENY OR DISBELIEVE IN AN UNCREATED CREATOR OPTION AS THE CAUSE OF THE UNIVERSE
therefor: ATHEISTS ARE IRRATIONAL, ILLOGICAL AND HAVE ZERO EVIDENCE.
What are STE and SCPNCEU?
i have no clue... he doesn't even explain what it means.
for all we know it could be accronyms for deadly deceases.
i did a little search to find out what they mean and found this gem"
http://philosotroll.com/2011/12/07/the-elliott-argument-and-failures-of-tensed-time.aspx
STE: Space and time are eternal
SCPNCEU: Something can come from pure nothingness and then create the entire Universe.
i find it hilarious that you have to find answers on a website that already label him as a troll.
So, what are your thoughts of this piece of fail?
couple of quick notes:
1 - he LOVES to type everything with the caps locks on.
2 - he has set all comments to be approved
3 - he loves to ban anyone who hands him his ass on a silver platter.
4 - he claims (like a real WLC fanboy) that this argument is unbeatable
5 - he think 90% of the atheists are too scared to debate him ( apparently he also has the same penis size of WLC, extra extra small)
if you haven't heard of it, it's this so-called "elliot argument" by fivethirty who calls himself... the "atheist killa"
this so-called argument has some additional notes.
I didn't make this up, this guy says it himself!
1- it's only for atheists who actually believe that our physical universe really exists.
2 - it's only to be used against atheists.
in his own words: "the elliot argument is designed to conquer, defeat, destroy, demolish, disassemble atheism, not agnostics"
source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqjkaD0OC1E
if you want to watch his video, he takes FOREVER to make his argument...
so here is his so-called argument:
premise #1: BOTH STE AND SCPNCEU ARE IRRATIONAL ILLOGICAL AND HAVE ZERO EVIDENCE.
premise #2: IF YOU DENY OR DISBELIEVE IN AN UNCREATED CREATOR OPTION AS THE CAUSE OF THE UNIVERSE, THEN YOUR ONLY TWO OPTIONS ARE STE AND SCPNCEU.
premise #3: ATHEIST DENY OR DISBELIEVE IN AN UNCREATED CREATOR OPTION AS THE CAUSE OF THE UNIVERSE
therefor: ATHEISTS ARE IRRATIONAL, ILLOGICAL AND HAVE ZERO EVIDENCE.
What are STE and SCPNCEU?
i have no clue... he doesn't even explain what it means.
for all we know it could be accronyms for deadly deceases.
i did a little search to find out what they mean and found this gem"
http://philosotroll.com/2011/12/07/the-elliott-argument-and-failures-of-tensed-time.aspx
STE: Space and time are eternal
SCPNCEU: Something can come from pure nothingness and then create the entire Universe.
i find it hilarious that you have to find answers on a website that already label him as a troll.
So, what are your thoughts of this piece of fail?
couple of quick notes:
1 - he LOVES to type everything with the caps locks on.
2 - he has set all comments to be approved
3 - he loves to ban anyone who hands him his ass on a silver platter.
4 - he claims (like a real WLC fanboy) that this argument is unbeatable
5 - he think 90% of the atheists are too scared to debate him ( apparently he also has the same penis size of WLC, extra extra small)
