• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

A Debate With A Vague God Enthusiast

B

Blog of Reason

New Member
arg-fallbackName="Blog of Reason"/>
Discussion thread for the blog entry "A Debate With A Vague God Enthusiast" by Th1sWasATriumph.

Permalink: http://blog.leagueofreason.org.uk/reason/a-debate-with-a-vague-god-enthusiast/
 
arg-fallbackName="Josan"/>
Great response! Respectful but honest and very quick to the point!

Just a small nitpick; you misspelt one of the quotes so that it looses a lot of it's meaning. The word "men" is missing "All are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore Socrates is mortal."
 
arg-fallbackName="monitoradiation"/>
*face-effing-palm*.

I would have asked to invite her to join our forum and post here, but I think quite a number of our members here in LoR might swear at her, and it might not be conducive to a cordial conversation.

Other than that, very good response :3
 
arg-fallbackName="ImprobableJoe"/>
monitoradiation said:
*face-effing-palm*.

I would have asked to invite her to join our forum and post here, but I think quite a number of our members here in LoR might swear at her, and it might not be conducive to a cordial conversation.
Click to expand...
Why the fuck not? :lol:
 
arg-fallbackName="ImprobableJoe"/>
GoodKat said:
Lol, and you're holding the mirror and the paintbrush.
Click to expand...
Please!

I am not responsible for the thin skins of other people, or their reactions to my posts. :)
 
arg-fallbackName="Th1sWasATriumph"/>
ImprobableJoe said:
Please!

I am not responsible for the thin skins of other people, or their reactions to my posts. :)
Click to expand...

Only reason I don't invite her to debate is because she doesn't even know I used what she said. I met her last night and she's actually pretty irritating, so I wouldn't mind people swearing if they made good points with it - and you, Joe, tend to do just that. Whilst yelling "COCK IT", but still :D
 
arg-fallbackName="Don_Key"/>
I liked your responses, especially.
"you're asking to verify something which definitionally, as soon as it is verified, STOPS being beyond physics."

I had a thought along similar lines regarding.
"Where did the first energy source come from?"
That question asks for a place and alludes to a time at which the concepts of space and time have no validity.
How does envisioning existence against a background of nothing, make any more sense than against a background of noise?
 
arg-fallbackName="Fordi"/>
Don_Key said:
I liked your responses, especially.
"you're asking to verify something which definitionally, as soon as it is verified, STOPS being beyond physics."

I had a thought along similar lines regarding.
"Where did the first energy source come from?"
That question asks for a place and alludes to a time at which the concepts of space and time have no validity.
How does envisioning existence against a background of nothing, make any more sense than against a background of noise?
Click to expand...

A background of noise, at least, has some variation from which imbalance - and thus, energy - can concentrate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top