abelcainsbrother
New Member
http://www.thomism.org/atheism/atheist_logic.html
it speaks for itself.
it speaks for itself.
-
Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
100' s of proofs God does not exist from atheists
- Thread starter abelcainsbrother
- Start date
Yeah it certainly does. You would be stupid to think those are arguments. It seemed like it was some sort of satire then grew into an ever growing collage of stupid arguments that no on ever makes...however I have heard similar ones used for the existence of god.
abelcainsbrother
New Member
Mugnuts said:
Admit it.You have made up your mind there is no God and no evidence will change it.You come off like this to me because I have presented all kinds of evidence over time for my faith and yet you just explain it away and ignore it and want me to shut-up.I disagree with you but I don't believe in censorship I'm all for freedom.Are you intellectually honest?I have actually learned somethings from you,I bet you didn't realize it.I don't get angry over beliefs or opinions,I may get frustrated when I think evidence is being ignored but I don't get angry because I know I have evidence and reasons for what I believe.Atheists can satire Christians,I guess.
abelcainsbrother said:
So what have you learned. At least that sounds interesting and entertaining.
As for the "made up mind" garbage, you seem to forget I have already stated that my mind could and can be changed with the appropriate evidence. That came up in your first month here. I didn't know I would have to keep repeating myself to have my point understood.
The evidence you produce, is only evidence in name. After scrutiny, your presented evidence does not fit your conclusion. It's your conclusion that is dismissed once the evidence can be shown to point in a more probable and or definite direction.
Anyone can use satire as a method of communication for many reasons whether it be for pure comedic value or sometimes to point out hypocrisy, irony, and so on. I thought the first few were kind of funny because some of those arguments may have well been made by uneducated people using arguments they don't understand. However, once you start to see the parade strawman arguments put into a few small sentences, mis-represented and parodied as if Kent Hovind were in charge of this project. It seems quite silly and dishonest. The value of satire was been lost yet it kept going and going and going...I don't recommend Christian Satire generally, eg: Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort. Nuff said.
I'll admit I haven't read all of it (spent about 10 minutes though) but I will try to get through it all. That's the difference between you and I. I read through all of what you present. I throw a tremendous amount of doubt towards the notion that you do the same.
Shanara99
New Member
abelcainsbrother said:
Actually, if god made a miracle that couldn't be attributed to anything but omnipotence, say, for example, moving an inmovable object, or creating a square circle, and he or she repeated it in double blind conditions, as many times as necesary? I would believe in him/her.
Once again, I'm just an apatheist. As we say "God may exist, or god may not exist, who cares? it's just religion, anyways"