D
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL
You keep demonstrating that you don't have a fucking clue what you're yammering about.
Alleles don't have 'limits' you complete fucking dong - alleles are variants in a gene.
It's like you just read the first couple of sentences, realized you were clueless, and started yammering thinking you could bluff it - but of course, as I know what I am talking about, your idiotic nonsense is not going to fool me.
Why would they?
Only, you haven't explained why this would notionally occur.
It certainly has nothing to do with my explanation for you, so you're clearly a grossly incompetent buffoon making a tool of himself publicly.
Sexually transmitted diseases occur between humans, just so you're aware. Not that it's likely it'll ever matter to you as I can't imagine you've got much chance of getting laid.
Honestly, I am not sure it's possible for you to ever understand anything - you have to be one of the thickest individuals imaginable.
Can we please just focus on evolution, and ignore any distractions?
verity of genes wont come unless father or mother of child is coming from different background
or else this allege but you are talking some nonsense that in course of upcoming time europeans will give births to chinese, africans, in spite of having sex with amongst europeans or whtie with whites.
hahaha, what an impractical nonsense.
so you have practically nothing to desmontrate your hypothesis that how one room turns into another ? huh?
and now so far that sex life goes, so beyond humans if you had sex with dogs and monkeys or apes than you will die
because your pseudo allele
is not absolute but it works under certain limits. and those limits dont allow such things and instead of giving births womens gets diseased and gives gift to entire human race with aids, shyphilis as it is very common in europa.
so would you demonstrate your hypothesis or not ?
Ordinarily, yes, that would be the idea. What's troublesome is long standing, intelligent members taking time out of their day to explain things in good faith to anning, and anning returning the favour by flipping them the bird.
A species is a population of organisms.
That population is spread out over an area.
Among that population is naturally occurring variation.
That variation is genetic, and therefore inheritable.
An allele is one of two, or more, forms of a given gene variant.
Over time (reproductive generations) the population will experience changes in the frequency of the distribution of alleles across that population.
That, with nothing more necessary to add, is how the process of evolution works.
However, we need to go a step further to answer the remainder of your question.
There are 4 types of speciation: allopatric, paripatric, and sympatric.
Allopatric speciation occurs when some physical barrier arises between two parts of the overall population meaning that the groups are separated physically and cannot continue to interbreed. Over generations, the two groups which are reproductively isolated from one and other will accrue novel genetic mutations that spread through the population and will, overall, have a substantively different distribution of alleles that will only continue to grow the longer the two groups are separated. Eventually, the two groups will no longer even be reproductively compatible and will be considered two distinct species.
Peripatric is more about the colonization of a new territory by a subset of the main population which then results in the same barrier to reproduction, and isolation producing speciation.
But there are many ways for it to occur, even large group size and successful spreading over a large area can promote speciation when subgroups no longer frequently interbreed.
All of this is evidenced in thousands of studies, has been observed in the lab (with bacterial studies and fruit flies for example), and in the wild in a population of lizards (for example) and can be corroborated by genetics, and by the discovery of fossils. As mentioned earlier, both biogeographical distribution and comparative anatomy also provide more consilient evidence corroborating the fact of evolution.
Sorry if anybody thinks this cruel, but this really needs to be memorialised...
View attachment 226
Or am I the only one who facepalmed in extremis?
I like how he keeps squeaking - he usually gets banned before he's made to squeak.
The only thing "admin" is openly partial to is not having multiple dumpster fire threads brimming with copy-paste unintelligible gibberish. Call me crazy. Are you friends with Otangelo?
Who the fuck do you think you're kidding, anning? YOU are guilty of the aforementioned offences, not anyone else, you and only you.
You've had one thread locked after multiple warnings, you've had 2x temp bans of the shortest period this forum allows for, and all for the same crap. The previous thread was locked because it could no longer serve the purpose for which it was intended, you were invited to make a new thread and start again, and here we are with the same infantile cockwaffle.
Stop telling other members to leave the thread/forum. In case you hadn't noticed for some bizarre reason, this isn't your website.
Meet the new Otangelo, same as the old Otangelo...I suppose we did need a new Otangelo Grassis (Rationalist)
Yes, you do lack the ability to understand, which is why you keep jabbering ignorant nonsense that would embarrass a child.
Yeah, so people from a given population have a suite of alleles distinct to that population, ergo when people from two populations mix, the alleles also mix. This should already have been quite clear from my explanation, but you're obviously about as intelligent as a rock, so I understand why you're confused. Confusion must be your normal state of mind given how dense you are.
Another bizarre idea you've decided to repeat 50 times, even when the first iteration was embarrassingly inept.
Evolution isn't pokemon, chap.
No understanding of evolution entails believing that cross-breeding between different species would occur - in fact, I expressly told you this in the post you're supposedly replying to, but you're just too damn stupid to understand...
See?
No, because you're thick. That's why.
Already done - feel free to grow up, mature intellectually, discover some basic moral principles, then come back and have another swing at it.
Until then...
What a drooling numpty!
As long as you can tell the difference between fact and fantasy, then a little imaginative play is only a good thing. Its when you think the contents of your imagination decree reality that shit goes wrong.
just demonstrate how this off-shot takes place ? how one room or species turns into another ? damn how ?Greetings,
This thread is in danger of getting side-tracked like the other one.
Can we please just focus on evolution, and ignore any distractions?
Anning, you appear to have several misunderstandings about evolution.
You appear to think that evolution works instantly through sex- it doesn't.
1) Evolution works through natural selection - it's the environment that drives evolution. As I explained in the other thread, the environment shapes species in the same way that a vessel shapes the water into which it is poured.
In fact, the full title of Darwin's book is, "On The Origin Of Species, By Natural Selection".
2) It takes very long periods of time for new species to evolve.
Yes, cats don't give birth to dogs - but over a very long period of time (millions of years), small changes will eventually result in a species resembling dogs.
Land animals evolved from fish.
Early on, some members of coast-dwelling fish were able to drag themselves onto beaches for short periods of time to eat something, perhaps insects.
These had an advantage over the other fish.
They passed on the genes allowing their offspring to also drag themselves onto beaches.
Over a very long period of time. through many generations. this resulted in more than one population.
1) The original population of water-only fish (aquatic);
2) A second population that were equally at home in water, and on land (amphibious);
3) A third population that were more at home on land rather than in water (terrestrial).
You start out with one population (species), and end up with three populations (species).
The evolution of whales went the other way - we started out with mammals (particularly a coast-dwelling species), from which an amphibious species evolved, from which an aquatic species evolved
Does this make sense?
Kindest regards,
James
HAHAHAHAH
He thinks alleles are 'pseudo' - you can stop pretending to have any interest in reality at all, anning.
really ? huh? really? did you traced everything that how it started ? am i mad that i will abuse any random person without knowing them ? do you want to say that cringe, crazy type of idiot ? that i would do anything like that without any reason ?
did you seen our fellow member ? and since now everything is given in written, so i have solid proof that how it started. but it all has fallen blind into your eyes. and what is that unintelligible gibberish ? huh? that you are not neurtal against me ? and partial to your fellow members who are nothing but attention seeking whores, because all lines of reasaoning they have rejected. and still asked me to appolize them ? all are ranting, moaning, screaming etc nonsense are done but fun is you are also similar to like them, or else how one can support such foolishness ?
so instead of being not neutral against me nothing is really unintelligent rubbish.
_________________
and this website maybe mine or anyone else, but you cannot make your own laws that 2 + 2 would be 3 or 5 for the members of this forum. do you understand that ? that you cannot do either after keeping such names of this forum like leauge of reasonoing. do you understand that ? ( o competent reasonable man ?) huh?
and now find it out that here and here i disturbed anyone else ? can you point it out ? yet all uncivilized varna sankars disturbed me, moaned at me, ranted after breaking all lines of reasoning.
i think that someone else who happened to be the wiser than the wisest spoke it all rightly, that when one gets everything so easily, and have everything they dont want peaceful life anymore.
just demonstrate how this off-shot takes place ? how one room or species turns into another ? damn how ?
Greetings,
This thread is in danger of getting side-tracked like the other one.
Can we please just focus on evolution, and ignore any distractions?
Anning, you appear to have several misunderstandings about evolution.
You appear to think that evolution works instantly through sex- it doesn't.
1) Evolution works through natural selection - it's the environment that drives evolution. As I explained in the other thread, the environment shapes species in the same way that a vessel shapes the water into which it is poured.
In fact, the full title of Darwin's book is, "On The Origin Of Species, By Natural Selection".
2) It takes very long periods of time for new species to evolve.
Yes, cats don't give birth to dogs - but over a very long period of time (millions of years), small changes will eventually result in a species resembling dogs.
Land animals evolved from fish.
Early on, some members of coast-dwelling fish were able to drag themselves onto beaches for short periods of time to eat something, perhaps insects.
These had an advantage over the other fish.
They passed on the genes allowing their offspring to also drag themselves onto beaches.
Over a very long period of time. through many generations. this resulted in more than one population.
1) The original population of water-only fish (aquatic);
2) A second population that were equally at home in water, and on land (amphibious);
3) A third population that were more at home on land rather than in water (terrestrial).
You start out with one population (species), and end up with three populations (species).
The evolution of whales went the other way - we started out with mammals (particularly a coast-dwelling species), from which an amphibious species evolved, from which an aquatic species evolved
Does this make sense?
Kindest regards,
James
now that allele is not an proof of anything, because white or europeans people who have sex with another whites or europeans wont give births to blacks or chinese people. do you understand it ?
and there is nothing natural in our world, because there is immigration laws and so many things like laws and justice, education, military, dressing, english medium types of schools, trading, economy etc things which are maintained by everyone else, because we humans give it shapes. so we have control upon things and are not free to anything like natural selection! do you understnad that ? huh?
so what this allele is ? huh? does it made ever possible that white having sex another whites giving births to chinese or blacks ? if not than how does this off-shot or one room or species turning into another takes place ? damn how ?
________________
and whatever nonsense you are speaking after observing lots of superficially rubbish things dont makes sense at all. you dont makes sense.
because - because your allele has now failed so would you demonstrate your hypothesis ? would you ? demonstrate your hypothesis and nothing else.
Greetings,
I already explained it on page 2.
Here it is again: 1) Evolution works through natural selection - it's the environment that drives evolution. As I explained in the other thread, the environment shapes species in the same way that a vessel shapes the water into which it is poured.
Read through it line by line - tell me which line do you not understand and/or agree with.
Do you understand that modern humans came out of Africa. spread to Europe (where they interbred with an earlier hominid called Neanderthals), then spread to Asia (where they interbred with another earlier hominid called Denisovans) before, finally spreading to the Americas?
We're all a single species despite looking different.
We're also a mongrel species because we're the result of the interbreeding between a number of related hominids - both before we left Africa, and after.
If you were to have a DNA test, you'd find that you have African, and European DNA. Depending on which caste you belong, there may be other Asian DNA within your genome.
Of course we're at the mercy of natural selection: we get 50% of our genes from each of our parents, and we are each born with anything up to 200 mutations in our genes (depending on how they're counted - the average is 70).
All of that means that we're at the mercy of natural selection - neither our parents or you or I or anyone get to choose which genes we get. The 50% of genes from each of our parents is unpredictable, if not random - there's no human control over it. I have an unidentical twin brother - we have different genes from our parents even though we have the same parents, and are twins.
Do you understand?
As Sparhafoc explained to you, an allele is a gene variant, due to the mutations I mentioned above.
As I told you above, I already explained how species evolve on page 2, which I included at the top of this post.
And you're still repeating this idea that evolution occurs instantly through sex. Re-read my post above.
Read through my post above again, and tell me at which point in my explanation are you getting lost. I am more than happy to try to clear up your misunderstanding, anning.
Kindest regards,
James
just like you ? who is beaten in so many points!
yet have no effect at all ? huh? do you meant just like yourself ? huh?
nope, you keep your advice to yourself.