surreptitious75
New Member
I cannot demonstrate a referent of the metaphysical because all my knowledge and experience of reality is physical
But since I cannot prove the negative with regard to it either then I have no choice but to let it be as that is all one can do
I am merely using the definition of metaphysical that theists use so if that definition is lacking the onus is them to change it not me
One can only go upon definitions that are actually provided as anything else would be a strawman and so therefore a logical fallacy
However I think all of observable reality is physical by default but I cannot demonstrate that either so also do not make the truth claim
Here physical is defined as simply that which exists and so includes the mental which is usually regarded as being in a different category
Which is false because the mental is a sub set of the physical as opposed to being entirely separate from it [ which would make it non physical ]
This is one of the problems with putting things into boxes and why one should never confuse the map with the terrain as a consequence of this
For reality is not a nice neat row of boxes rather existence in a constant state of motion ever since time and space and energy and matter came into being
Sometimes categorisation is unavoidable [ indeed most times it is ] but approximation of reality and reality are still not the same however and never will be
Although it is equally important to remember that reality is not just something that is OUT THERE but is also something that is IN HERE [ taps head ]
So subjective interpretation of reality is therefore also a part of reality too [ even when paradoxically such interpretation is also demonstrably false ]
But since I cannot prove the negative with regard to it either then I have no choice but to let it be as that is all one can do
I am merely using the definition of metaphysical that theists use so if that definition is lacking the onus is them to change it not me
One can only go upon definitions that are actually provided as anything else would be a strawman and so therefore a logical fallacy
However I think all of observable reality is physical by default but I cannot demonstrate that either so also do not make the truth claim
Here physical is defined as simply that which exists and so includes the mental which is usually regarded as being in a different category
Which is false because the mental is a sub set of the physical as opposed to being entirely separate from it [ which would make it non physical ]
This is one of the problems with putting things into boxes and why one should never confuse the map with the terrain as a consequence of this
For reality is not a nice neat row of boxes rather existence in a constant state of motion ever since time and space and energy and matter came into being
Sometimes categorisation is unavoidable [ indeed most times it is ] but approximation of reality and reality are still not the same however and never will be
Although it is equally important to remember that reality is not just something that is OUT THERE but is also something that is IN HERE [ taps head ]
So subjective interpretation of reality is therefore also a part of reality too [ even when paradoxically such interpretation is also demonstrably false ]
Last edited: