So no then.
So once again you were flapping your gums but when challenged, it was all bluster.
This isn't going to work for you dude. Sort it out.
-
Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
Donations can be made via here
What Do You Identify As On The Political Spectrum?
So no then.
So once again you were flapping your gums but when challenged, it was all bluster.
This isn't going to work for you dude. Sort it out.
D
Deleted member 42253
Guest
I ll remind you of that, when things start going south.
Well ... even more south, I d say enviromental activists being treated like domestic terrorists already, is pretty bad.
You forgot the requisite maniacal cackle needed to complete the 'I'll be shown right one day' failure.
You're not right now, then, are ya?
So would I, but then I would also need to be talking about real world phenomena, not the contents of your imagination.
D
Deleted member 42253
Guest
...
Revealed: US listed climate activist group as ‘extremists’ alongside mass killers
DHS listed activists engaged in non-violent civil disobedience targeting oil industry alongside white supremacists in documents
"During closing arguments the prosecutor compared Foster to the Unabomber and the 9/11 hijackers."
BoganUSAFFLClerk
Active Member
These results seem odd.
BoganUSAFFLClerk
Active Member
Eric Garner Criminal Past Emerges: 30 Arrests In 34 Years, Including Assault
Eric Garner had a criminal past. That’s just one of the new reveals in a post from conservative media site Newsmax and another from the Wall Street Journal. The Newsmax post, entitled “11 Facts About the Eric Garner Case the Media Won’t Tell You,” attempts to explain how a grand jury of 23 could...
www.inquisitr.com
"...At 350 pounds, Garner suffered from "a number of health problems, including heart disease, severe asthma, diabetes, obesity, and sleep apnea...."
"...Garner, 43, had history of more than 30 arrests dating back to 1980, on charges including assault and grand larceny...Garner's first arrest at just 10-years-old..."
He died because he unhealthy and stupid and a long time career criminal that finally resisted arrest and they (cops) didn't take him at his word (neither would I).
BoganUSAFFLClerk
Active Member
Because that's exactly what I wrote in my one word post, isn't it?
Much like if I replied: you think he deserved to be murdered because he's black, don't you?
QED why taking screenshots offers zero contextual or discursive benefit.
Can you make a squeaky nose noise next time you reply, as it will save me from having to imagine it.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 619
Guest
I'm staring to wonder if any sharks are being harmed in these aerobatic manoeuvres...
BoganUSAFFLClerk
Active Member
Jumping the shark has nothing to do with logical leaps in verbal arguments. You fumbled that analogy or joke or dumb statement. Shouldn't it be: mental gymnastics and no practitioners haven't been harmed in the making in this film - something related to this?
Last edited:
BoganUSAFFLClerk
Active Member
Ah but you are purposefully vague. Blame yourself.
If you are going to argue then argue don't be an asshole. Otherwise I keep having to bounce guesses to illustrate the point until you do.
They keep direct more direct context when it concerns images but I use it because I know people can't stand it. So if you want it to stop then actually argue and stop being the forum idiots you guys continue to be.
No but I can keep uploading screenshots.
Up to you man.
The word 'no' is apparently 'purposefully vague'.
HONK HONK
Here's my suggestion to you QClown.
Go look in a dictionary.
Look up the word 'no'.
Report back if the definition offered of the word 'no' by ANY dictionary is written as:
"Ah so he was smart for being a repeat offender and resisting arrest I suupose?"
If it is, I will go and buy a hat just to eat it.
Otherwise, you're just being a bimbo again, aren't you?
No, they don't.
The context is right here in this thread.
You try to snip things out of context with your snaps - not once or twice, but it seems the main reason why you employ them rather than just citing the post in question.
As for 'idiot' - Dr. Dunning & Dr. Kruger want a word with you.
D
Deleted member 619
Guest
No, but it does apply to increasingly preposterous attempts to prolong the inevitable death of something.
Silly bugger. my next-door neighbour's cat has better grasp of logic than you do. And considerably superior reading comprehension.