I think DepricatedZero is labouring under the delusion that if he types "overruled" often enough then it will start to mean something relevant. Whether you accept my objections or not is meaningless, so I suggest you return under the bridge you periodically emerge from.
Oh and, according to your post, (using "overruled." as a search-term),there are no less than 9 instances of you saying just that, in ONE post, all of which were made in this thread, all in one day.
*lol* At a cursory glance, my initial instincts tell me that it's designed to be distracting, to distract from your flawed arguments... it looks to be nothing more than a ploy, in a vain effort to encourage people to perceive your arguments to be more compelling, than they actually are.
Wow, do I feel stupid using the reasoning of a moderator and contributor of the League of Reason.
Fear not DepricatedZero, unlike your cohorts, I will respond with something intelligent. I just wanted to open up some blinders and let the Sun shine in.
Oh and, according to your post, (using "overruled." as a search-term),there are no less than 9 instances of you saying just that, in ONE post, all of which were made in this thread, all in one day.
*lol* At a cursory glance, my initial instincts tell me that it's designed to be distracting, to distract from your flawed arguments... it looks to be nothing more than a ploy, in a vain effort to encourage people to perceive your arguments to be more compelling, than they actually are.
Wow, do I feel stupid using the reasoning of a moderator and contributor of the League of Reason.
Fear not DepricatedZero, unlike your cohorts, I will respond with something intelligent. I just wanted to open up some blinders and let the Sun shine in.