• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

The Onion DNA Similarity Test For Creationists

Call Me Emo

New Member
arg-fallbackName="Call Me Emo"/>
Written by: Emotionally Stunted Emoticon


Creationists tend to argue that the 98.5 percent DNA similarity between Humans and Chimps is a myth [9]. They argue this by pointing out several "anomalies" in the comparison such as Chimps having an 11.5% larger genome to Humans [2], and the fact that large portions of both Human and Chimp DNA (1.3 Billion letters) was excluded from the analysis [7,8,9]. Because of this, they say that it is mathematically impossible to get a 98.5% DNA similarity between Humans and Chimps and that the similarity should be at most 89%.

Screenshot_20200404-120546.png

As is known, DNA comparisons are neither simple nor strait forward, and may yield different results according to the method/s used [1]. As explained briefly in the video [7] and in more detail in the paper below [8], they're practical reasons for why Geneticists would exclude large portions of DNA when performing comparisons between Species, and mainly focus the protein coding regions.

Screenshot_20200404-120602.png

Now since Creationists seem to have an issue with the "Evolutionists" methods of measuring DNA similarity between Humans and Chimps, then I have a little test for them. Here we have two Species of Onions, Allium Ursinum and Allium Altyncolicum within the Genus Allium, that are closely related enough to hybridize [5,6] so it shouldn't be difficult to accept that they're related. However, A. Ursinum has a genome size of ~30.81 Billion bp, compared to A. Altyncolicum that has a genome size of ~6.85 Billion bp.

Quote:
"The genome size of 30 Allium species varies from 7 pg (A. altyncolicum, 2n = 4 × = 32) to 31.5 pg (A. ursinum, 2n = 2 × = 14)" [3]

Screenshot_20200404-120554.png

The Onion Test:
By what method/s do we go about measuring the DNA similarity between these two closely related Species of Onions, when one has a genome size that is 4.5 times larger than the other? ...And how do you think your answer would affect your argument against the "Evolutionists" method on the Human/Chimp DNA comparison??



REFERENCES:

1) How do we measure genetic similarity?:


2) ProGenesis: 95 Theses Against Evolution: A Scientific Critique of the Naturalist Philosophy (Page 239):
https://books.google.com/books?id=I...s 11.5% larger than the human genome.&f=false

3) Evolution of genome size across some cultivated Allium species. Agnès Ricroch et al, 2005 [PDF]:
https://www.researchgate.net/public...me_size_across_some_cultivated_Allium_species

4) Identification and characterization of abundant repetitive sequences in Allium cepa:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-52995-9

5) Hybrid plants of onion and garlic or Chinese chive and method for breeding and propagating the same:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5367111A/en

6) Interspecific crosses of onion with distant Allium species and characterization of the presumed hybrids by means of flow cytometry, karyotype analysis and genomic in situ hybridization [PDF]:
https://www.researchgate.net/public...pe_analysis_and_genomic_in_situ_hybridization

7) Minute Earth - Are we 99% Chimp?:


8) Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04072

9) Differences Between Chimp and Human DNA Recalculated. Nathaniel Jeanson, 2015:
https://answersingenesis.org/geneti...ces-between-chimp-and-human-dna-recalculated/
 
arg-fallbackName="Led Zeppelin"/>
Well, I think the size of the genome should be taken into account when comparing similarity. Why not?
 
Back
Top