he_who_is_nobody said:Turns out WildwoodClaire1 and I were mistaken. Woops.
There we go, on the same page now! Incidentally Claire mentioned exactly the sorts of problems I noticed. I would add that Snelling was not consistent in describing the level of preservation of the piece of wood. Near the beginning he says it's only partially fossilized, but says fossilized wood throughout the rest of the paper, but then notes it had high levels of minerals present that are typical of petrifaction, making me think that the carbon present is almost certainly resulting from contamination. It seemed to me that he didn't know how well the tree was preserved, and so blew it off by subtly equating terms to mask his own doubt and deceive his readers.