• Welcome to League Of Reason Forums! Please read the rules before posting.
    If you are willing and able please consider making a donation to help with site overheads.
    Donations can be made via here

The Bible is true, but what you heard about it is not.

arg-fallbackName="AronRa"/>
It's frustrating when you get an opportunity like this to reason with someone who doesn't know what reason is, but they always sabotage it and bugger off.
 
arg-fallbackName="JRChadwick"/>
AronRa said:
It's frustrating when you get an opportunity like this to reason with someone who doesn't know what reason is, but they always sabotage it and bugger off.
Always have low expectations when arguing against someone with fixed beliefs.
 
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
AronRa said:
It's frustrating when you get an opportunity like this to reason with someone who doesn't know what reason is, but they always sabotage it and bugger off.

Well, I do not think shauk100 has completely buggered off. I believe that if a debate thread were created for the both of you, shauk100 would be more then happy to "reason" with you.
 
arg-fallbackName="Visaki"/>
he_who_is_nobody said:
Well, I do not think shauk100 has completely buggered off. I believe that if a debate thread were created for the both of you, shauk100 would be more then happy to "reason" with you.
Lets hope so. As I've said it can me a bit mindboggling to see half a dozen people picking your arguments apart.

Anyways I had a thought about the death of Judas in the place where many good thoughts appear; the toilet.

Lets take it that the apologists claim is right and that Judas actually died but hanging himself and then dropping head first and going all kaputt. What would this actually mean? Well, it'd mean that the writers of the two versions of Judas' death either

a: wrote what they heard (neither was an eyewitness) and thus honestly left out major parts of the story because they didn't know them.

b: knew the whole story but chose, for some reason, to write a version that left out what could only could be said to be a major part of the it.

Neither option is actually good for the apologist. Both of them mean that the Bible can not be trusted to tell you the whole important story, regardless of if the writers left things out because they didn't know them or because they chose to. There is, I think, a reason why the classical court room vow says "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth".
 
arg-fallbackName="he_who_is_nobody"/>
[url=http://www.theleagueofreason.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=163132#p163132 said:
shauk100[/url]"]Can't wait for the debate! We have not set a date yet, and Aron and I are both trying to finish our projects, but we said tentatively around the 1st week of July, but that may have to change. I hope not, I'm hoping to finish with mine by that time.

It would be nice to get an update on this discussion. Is it going to happen or has skauk100 bowed out?
 
Back
Top