Refuting the "Highly expressed" gene argument against Chromosome 2 fusion

[Blog of Reason]

Discussion thread for the blog entry "Refuting the "Highly expressed" gene argument against Chromosome 2 fusion" by itsdemtitans.

Permalink: http://blog.leagueofreason.org.uk/science/refuting-the-highly-expressed-gene-argument-against-chromosome-2-fusion/

 

[Mr_Wilford]

Re: Refuting the

I'd made this over a month ago. Since then, I have asked Ken Miller to elaborate on variation I'm termination length explaining the data. Turns out it does not; he made a mistake and has agreed that the data is explained by a new transcription start site, not a new termination site.

So that claim can be disregarded.

I've revised the post and am simply waiting for the update

 

[he_who_is_nobody]

Re: Refuting the

Nicely done. My only criticism is stylistic. I think you should hyperlink all your links. It looks nicer and allows for easier reading.

 

[Mr_Wilford]

Re: Refuting the

Nicely done. My only criticism is stylistic. I think you should hyperlink all your links. It looks nicer and allows for easier reading.

I just figured out how to do that :lol:

All my other posts from now on will have hyperlinks